vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) and PAMT CORP (PAMT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PAMT CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($141.3M vs $86.7M, roughly 1.6× LXP Industrial Trust). LXP Industrial Trust runs the higher net margin — 33.2% vs -20.7%, a 53.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LXP Industrial Trust posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-14.0% vs -15.1%). Over the past eight quarters, LXP Industrial Trust's revenue compounded faster (0.3% CAGR vs -12.0%).
LXP Industrial Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality industrial real estate assets, primarily distribution centers, logistics facilities, and light industrial properties across key markets in the United States. Its tenant base covers e-commerce, third-party logistics, and advanced manufacturing sectors, delivering stable long-term returns for its investors.
LXP vs PAMT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.7M | $141.3M |
| Net Profit | $28.8M | $-29.3M |
| Gross Margin | 81.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 34.6% | -27.0% |
| Net Margin | 33.2% | -20.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -14.0% | -15.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 7.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-1.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $86.7M | $141.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.9M | $150.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.7M | $151.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.9M | $155.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.9M | $166.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.6M | $182.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $85.8M | $182.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $86.3M | $182.6M |
| Q4 25 | $28.8M | $-29.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.3M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.1M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.0M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-31.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-269.0K | $281.0K |
| Q4 25 | 81.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 82.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 81.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 85.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 82.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 82.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 82.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 34.6% | -27.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.4% | -3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.7% | -7.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.8% | -5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | -0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | -0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 33.2% | -20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.7% | -3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.2% | -6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | -5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | -1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.3% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.12 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $170.4M | $83.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.4B | $333.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $210.5M |
| Total Assets | $3.5B | $697.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.66× | 1.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $170.4M | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $229.7M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.0M | $117.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.9M | $102.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.8M | $110.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.0M | $92.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.7M | $114.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $293.8M | $125.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $333.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $325.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $210.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $239.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $244.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $269.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $277.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $308.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $306.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $314.6M |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $697.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $715.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $707.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $712.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $741.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $756.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $733.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $746.4M |
| Q4 25 | 0.66× | 1.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | 1.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $188.7M | $-5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-25.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -17.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 13.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.56× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-23.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $188.7M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.5M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.3M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.0M | $5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $211.2M | $15.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.6M | $15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.5M | $18.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.9M | $9.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-25.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-39.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-33.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-12.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | -17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -18.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.0% |
| Q4 25 | 6.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.18× | 6.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.09× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 34.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LXP
Segment breakdown not available.
PAMT
| Freight Transportation Service | $123.1M | 87% |
| Fuel Surcharge | $18.2M | 13% |
