vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) and RADWARE LTD (RDWR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LXP Industrial Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($86.7M vs $75.3M, roughly 1.2× RADWARE LTD). LXP Industrial Trust runs the higher net margin — 33.2% vs 7.5%, a 25.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, RADWARE LTD's revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs 0.3%).
LXP Industrial Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality industrial real estate assets, primarily distribution centers, logistics facilities, and light industrial properties across key markets in the United States. Its tenant base covers e-commerce, third-party logistics, and advanced manufacturing sectors, delivering stable long-term returns for its investors.
Radware Ltd. is an American provider of cybersecurity and application delivery products for physical, cloud and software-defined data centers. Radware's corporate headquarters are located in Mahwah, New Jersey. The company also has offices in Europe, Africa and Asia Pacific regions. The company's global headquarters is in Israel. Radware is a member of the Rad Group of companies and its shares are traded on NASDAQ.
LXP vs RDWR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.7M | $75.3M |
| Net Profit | $28.8M | $5.7M |
| Gross Margin | 81.5% | 80.7% |
| Operating Margin | 34.6% | 4.1% |
| Net Margin | 33.2% | 7.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -14.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $86.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.9M | $75.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.7M | $74.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.9M | $72.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.6M | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $85.8M | $67.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $86.3M | $65.1M |
| Q4 25 | $28.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.3M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.1M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.0M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4M | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-269.0K | $-1.2M |
| Q4 25 | 81.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 82.3% | 80.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 81.9% | 80.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.7% | 80.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 85.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 82.5% | 80.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 82.0% | 80.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 82.4% | 80.3% |
| Q4 25 | 34.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | -0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | -1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | -5.6% |
| Q4 25 | 33.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.7% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.2% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.3% | -1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $170.4M | $98.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $357.1M |
| Total Assets | $3.5B | $618.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.66× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $170.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $229.7M | $98.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.0M | $98.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.9M | $98.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.0M | $70.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.7M | $70.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $293.8M | $70.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $357.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $357.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $357.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $323.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $323.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $323.3M |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $618.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $618.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $618.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $571.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $571.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $571.9M |
| Q4 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $188.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.56× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $188.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.3M | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.0M | $22.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $211.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.5M | $23.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $22.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.52× | 3.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.05× | 5.17× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.09× | 13.84× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
