vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) and Sezzle Inc. (SEZL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LXP Industrial Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($86.7M vs $78.2M, roughly 1.1× Sezzle Inc.). Sezzle Inc. runs the higher net margin — 54.6% vs 33.2%, a 21.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sezzle Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (61.6% vs -14.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Sezzle Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (76.0% CAGR vs 0.3%).
LXP Industrial Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality industrial real estate assets, primarily distribution centers, logistics facilities, and light industrial properties across key markets in the United States. Its tenant base covers e-commerce, third-party logistics, and advanced manufacturing sectors, delivering stable long-term returns for its investors.
Sezzle is a publicly traded financial technology company headquartered in Minneapolis, U.S, with operations in the United States and Canada. The company provides an alternative payment platform offering interest-free installment plans at selected online stores. As of June 2021, the Sezzle platform had over 10 million user sign-ups and over 48,000 participating merchants.
LXP vs SEZL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.7M | $78.2M |
| Net Profit | $28.8M | $42.7M |
| Gross Margin | 81.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 34.6% | 70.6% |
| Net Margin | 33.2% | 54.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -14.0% | 61.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 68.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $86.7M | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.9M | $57.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.7M | $52.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.9M | $48.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.9M | $48.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.6M | $35.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $85.8M | $30.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $86.3M | $25.2M |
| Q4 25 | $28.8M | $42.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.3M | $26.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.1M | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.0M | $36.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $15.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4M | $29.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-269.0K | $8.0M |
| Q4 25 | 81.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 82.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 81.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 85.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 82.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 82.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 82.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 34.6% | 70.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.4% | 61.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.7% | 69.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 63.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | 58.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | 55.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 54.8% |
| Q4 25 | 33.2% | 54.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.7% | 46.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.2% | 53.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | 75.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | 98.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.3% | 31.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.12 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $0.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $1.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $0.82 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | $0.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $170.4M | $64.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $169.8M |
| Total Assets | $3.5B | $400.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.66× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $170.4M | $64.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $229.7M | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.0M | $88.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.9M | $88.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.8M | $73.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.0M | $80.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.7M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $293.8M | $77.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $169.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $130.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $125.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $87.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $61.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $50.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $29.6M |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $400.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $367.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $350.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $298.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $298.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $252.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $212.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $195.7M |
| Q4 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $188.7M | $70.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $70.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 90.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.56× | 1.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $209.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $188.7M | $70.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.5M | $63.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.3M | $23.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.0M | $52.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $211.2M | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.6M | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.5M | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.9M | $16.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $70.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $63.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $52.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 90.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 110.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 108.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 118.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 98.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 73.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 63.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 6.56× | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.75× | 2.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.52× | 0.84× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.05× | 1.45× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.18× | 2.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.09× | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.00× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LXP
Segment breakdown not available.
SEZL
| Merchant And Partner Income | $28.9M | 37% |
| Transaction Income | $25.9M | 33% |
| Income From Other Services Late Payment Fees | $20.5M | 26% |
| Other | $2.9M | 4% |
