vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) and STRATASYS LTD. (SSYS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STRATASYS LTD. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($137.0M vs $86.7M, roughly 1.6× LXP Industrial Trust). LXP Industrial Trust runs the higher net margin — 33.2% vs -40.6%, a 73.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, STRATASYS LTD. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.2% vs -14.0%). Over the past eight quarters, LXP Industrial Trust's revenue compounded faster (0.3% CAGR vs -7.4%).
LXP Industrial Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality industrial real estate assets, primarily distribution centers, logistics facilities, and light industrial properties across key markets in the United States. Its tenant base covers e-commerce, third-party logistics, and advanced manufacturing sectors, delivering stable long-term returns for its investors.
Stratasys, Ltd. is an American-Israeli manufacturer of 3D printers, software, and materials for polymer additive manufacturing as well as 3D-printed parts on-demand. The company is incorporated in Israel. Engineers use Stratasys systems to model complex geometries in a wide range of polymer materials, including: ABS, polyphenylsulfone (PPSF), polycarbonate (PC), polyetherimide and Nylon 12.
LXP vs SSYS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.7M | $137.0M |
| Net Profit | $28.8M | $-55.6M |
| Gross Margin | 81.5% | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | 34.6% | -16.6% |
| Net Margin | 33.2% | -40.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -14.0% | -2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -109.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $86.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.9M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.7M | $138.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.9M | $136.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.6M | $140.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $85.8M | $138.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $86.3M | $144.1M |
| Q4 25 | $28.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.3M | $-55.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.1M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.0M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4M | $-25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-269.0K | $-26.0M |
| Q4 25 | 81.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 82.3% | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 81.9% | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.7% | 44.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 85.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 82.5% | 44.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 82.0% | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 82.4% | 44.4% |
| Q4 25 | 34.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.4% | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.7% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.8% | -9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | -18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | -18.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | -17.0% |
| Q4 25 | 33.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.7% | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.2% | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | -18.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.3% | -18.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $170.4M | $71.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $852.5M |
| Total Assets | $3.5B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.66× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $170.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $229.7M | $71.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.0M | $71.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.9M | $70.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.0M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.7M | $70.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $293.8M | $91.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $852.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $902.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $784.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $831.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $850.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $866.1M |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $188.7M | $6.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.56× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-11.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $188.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.5M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.3M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.0M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $211.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.6M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.5M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.9M | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | 6.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.09× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
