vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of LSB INDUSTRIES, INC. (LXU) and Zai Lab Ltd (ZLAB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($169.5M vs $127.1M, roughly 1.3× Zai Lab Ltd). On growth, LSB INDUSTRIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs 17.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Zai Lab Ltd's revenue compounded faster (20.8% CAGR vs 10.0%).

Eldridge Industries, LLC is an American holding company headquartered in Miami, with offices in New York City, Greenwich, Connecticut, London, and Beverly Hills. It invests in industries such as insurance, asset management, technology, sports, media, real estate, and the consumer sector.

Zai Lab Ltd is a global biopharmaceutical company focused on developing, manufacturing and commercializing innovative therapies for oncology, autoimmune disorders, infectious diseases and other unmet medical needs. It operates primarily in the Greater China region and partners with leading global biotech firms to expand access to life-saving treatments for underserved patient populations.

LXU vs ZLAB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LXU
LXU
1.3× larger
LXU
$169.5M
$127.1M
ZLAB
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
LXU
LXU
+1.0% gap
LXU
18.2%
17.1%
ZLAB
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ZLAB
ZLAB
Annualised
ZLAB
20.8%
10.0%
LXU

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
LXU
LXU
ZLAB
ZLAB
Revenue
$169.5M
$127.1M
Net Profit
$19.7M
Gross Margin
21.1%
51.0%
Operating Margin
13.7%
-54.6%
Net Margin
11.6%
Revenue YoY
18.2%
17.1%
Net Profit YoY
EPS (diluted)
$-0.05

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LXU
LXU
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q1 26
$169.5M
Q4 25
$165.0M
$127.1M
Q3 25
$155.4M
$115.4M
Q2 25
$151.3M
$109.1M
Q1 25
$143.4M
$105.7M
Q4 24
$134.9M
$108.5M
Q3 24
$109.2M
$101.8M
Q2 24
$140.1M
$100.1M
Net Profit
LXU
LXU
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q1 26
$19.7M
Q4 25
$16.1M
Q3 25
$7.1M
$-36.0M
Q2 25
$3.0M
$-40.7M
Q1 25
$-1.6M
$-48.4M
Q4 24
$-9.1M
Q3 24
$-25.4M
$-41.7M
Q2 24
$9.6M
$-80.3M
Gross Margin
LXU
LXU
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q1 26
21.1%
Q4 25
25.0%
51.0%
Q3 25
16.4%
59.5%
Q2 25
15.3%
60.6%
Q1 25
10.0%
63.6%
Q4 24
4.5%
61.5%
Q3 24
-7.3%
64.1%
Q2 24
19.6%
64.9%
Operating Margin
LXU
LXU
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q1 26
13.7%
Q4 25
16.2%
-54.6%
Q3 25
10.1%
-42.3%
Q2 25
6.9%
-50.3%
Q1 25
3.1%
-53.3%
Q4 24
-5.0%
-62.6%
Q3 24
-22.4%
-66.6%
Q2 24
10.3%
-76.0%
Net Margin
LXU
LXU
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q1 26
11.6%
Q4 25
9.8%
Q3 25
4.6%
-31.2%
Q2 25
2.0%
-37.3%
Q1 25
-1.1%
-45.8%
Q4 24
-6.8%
Q3 24
-23.2%
-40.9%
Q2 24
6.8%
-80.2%
EPS (diluted)
LXU
LXU
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$0.22
$-0.05
Q3 25
$0.10
$-0.03
Q2 25
$0.04
$-0.04
Q1 25
$-0.02
$-0.04
Q4 24
$-0.13
$-0.09
Q3 24
$-0.35
$-0.04
Q2 24
$0.13
$-0.08

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LXU
LXU
ZLAB
ZLAB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$181.7M
$689.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$770.0K
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$542.9M
$715.5M
Total Assets
$1.2B
$1.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.00×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LXU
LXU
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q1 26
$181.7M
Q4 25
$148.5M
$689.6M
Q3 25
$152.0M
$717.2M
Q2 25
$124.9M
$732.2M
Q1 25
$163.5M
$757.3M
Q4 24
$184.2M
$779.7M
Q3 24
$199.3M
$616.1M
Q2 24
$216.3M
$630.0M
Total Debt
LXU
LXU
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q1 26
$770.0K
Q4 25
$440.3M
Q3 25
$447.6M
Q2 25
$446.4M
Q1 25
$478.2M
Q4 24
$476.2M
Q3 24
$476.0M
Q2 24
$479.8M
Stockholders' Equity
LXU
LXU
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q1 26
$542.9M
Q4 25
$520.0M
$715.5M
Q3 25
$504.6M
$759.9M
Q2 25
$495.8M
$791.7M
Q1 25
$490.6M
$810.8M
Q4 24
$491.6M
$840.9M
Q3 24
$499.0M
$667.7M
Q2 24
$522.8M
$704.2M
Total Assets
LXU
LXU
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q1 26
$1.2B
Q4 25
$1.2B
$1.2B
Q3 25
$1.1B
$1.2B
Q2 25
$1.1B
$1.2B
Q1 25
$1.2B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$1.2B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$1.2B
$985.3M
Q2 24
$1.2B
$987.4M
Debt / Equity
LXU
LXU
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q1 26
0.00×
Q4 25
0.85×
Q3 25
0.89×
Q2 25
0.90×
Q1 25
0.97×
Q4 24
0.97×
Q3 24
0.95×
Q2 24
0.92×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
LXU
LXU
ZLAB
ZLAB
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-26.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-26.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-21.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-158.9M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
LXU
LXU
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$17.9M
$-26.0M
Q3 25
$52.6M
$-32.0M
Q2 25
$18.2M
$-31.0M
Q1 25
$6.8M
$-61.7M
Q4 24
$4.0M
$-55.8M
Q3 24
$17.1M
$-26.8M
Q2 24
$41.4M
$-42.2M
Free Cash Flow
LXU
LXU
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-3.2M
$-26.7M
Q3 25
$35.6M
$-35.0M
Q2 25
$-315.0K
$-33.9M
Q1 25
$-14.0M
$-63.2M
Q4 24
$-24.2M
$-58.4M
Q3 24
$-13.9M
$-28.2M
Q2 24
$26.6M
$-42.9M
FCF Margin
LXU
LXU
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q1 26
Q4 25
-1.9%
-21.0%
Q3 25
22.9%
-30.4%
Q2 25
-0.2%
-31.1%
Q1 25
-9.8%
-59.9%
Q4 24
-18.0%
-53.8%
Q3 24
-12.8%
-27.7%
Q2 24
19.0%
-42.9%
Capex Intensity
LXU
LXU
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q1 26
Q4 25
12.8%
0.5%
Q3 25
10.9%
2.6%
Q2 25
12.2%
2.6%
Q1 25
14.5%
1.5%
Q4 24
20.9%
2.4%
Q3 24
28.4%
1.3%
Q2 24
10.5%
0.7%
Cash Conversion
LXU
LXU
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.11×
Q3 25
7.39×
Q2 25
6.04×
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
4.33×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

LXU
LXU

AN & Nitric Acid$75.3M44%
Urea ammonium nitrate (UAN)$49.2M29%
Ammonia$36.8M22%
Other$8.2M5%

ZLAB
ZLAB

Zejula$56.0M44%
Other$21.9M17%
Nuzyra$16.0M13%
Optune$11.9M9%
XACDURO$10.7M8%
Qinlock$9.7M8%
AUGTYRO$836.0K1%

Related Comparisons