vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Magnera Corp (MAGN) and PACS Group, Inc. (PACS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PACS Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $792.0M, roughly 1.7× Magnera Corp). PACS Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.4% vs -4.3%, a 8.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PACS Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.4% vs 12.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Magnera Corp's revenue compounded faster (54.9% CAGR vs 20.5%).
MAGN vs PACS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $792.0M | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $-34.0M | $59.7M |
| Gross Margin | 12.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.8% | 7.0% |
| Net Margin | -4.3% | 4.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.8% | 18.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 43.3% | 3022.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.95 | $0.42 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $792.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $839.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $824.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $702.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $332.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $556.0M | $981.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $558.0M | $934.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-34.0M | $59.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $52.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.0M | $51.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-41.0M | $28.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-60.0M | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.2M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.0M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.0M | $49.1M |
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 22.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.2% | 21.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | 8.6% |
| Q4 25 | -4.3% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.4% | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.5% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.95 | $0.42 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.51 | $0.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.15 | $0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.69 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.33 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.60 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.44 | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $264.0M | $197.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | $353.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $946.8M |
| Total Assets | $3.9B | $5.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.86× | 0.37× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $264.0M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $355.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $276.0M | $294.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $282.0M | $287.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $215.0M | $157.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $230.0M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.9M | $73.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.2M | $81.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $353.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $411.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $877.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $884.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $946.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $871.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $806.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $750.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $709.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $660.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $572.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $128.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $5.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $3.9B |
| Q4 25 | 1.86× | 0.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.77× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.80× | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.36× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.0M | $-3.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-13.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.06× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $204.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $52.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.0M | $150.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-58.0M | $64.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.2M | $209.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.0M | $34.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.0M | $58.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-13.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-74.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.06× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.43× | 1.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MAGN
| Other | $451.0M | 57% |
| United States And Canada | $341.0M | 43% |
PACS
Segment breakdown not available.
