vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Magnera Corp (MAGN) and Teradyne (TER). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Teradyne is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $792.0M, roughly 1.6× Magnera Corp). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 31.1% vs -4.3%, a 35.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Teradyne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (87.0% vs 12.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Magnera Corp's revenue compounded faster (54.9% CAGR vs 32.6%).
Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.
MAGN vs TER — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $792.0M | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $-34.0M | $398.9M |
| Gross Margin | 12.2% | 60.9% |
| Operating Margin | 1.8% | 36.9% |
| Net Margin | -4.3% | 31.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.8% | 87.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 43.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.95 | $2.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $792.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $769.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $839.0M | $651.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $824.0M | $685.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $702.0M | $752.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $332.1M | $737.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $556.0M | $729.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $398.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-34.0M | $257.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.0M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-41.0M | $98.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-60.0M | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.2M | $145.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.0M | $186.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | 57.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.1% | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | 59.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 58.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.1% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.3% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.0% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.5% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.4% | 25.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.53 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.95 | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.51 | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.15 | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.69 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.33 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.60 | $1.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $264.0M | $241.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | $0 |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | — |
| Total Assets | $3.9B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.86× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $241.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $264.0M | $293.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $272.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $276.0M | $339.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $282.0M | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $215.0M | $553.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $230.0M | $510.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.9M | $421.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $877.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.86× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.77× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.80× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.37× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.0M | $265.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-13.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $265.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | $281.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $182.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.0M | $161.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-58.0M | $282.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.2M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.0M | $216.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-13.0M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $131.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.0M | $97.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-74.0M | $225.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6M | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.0M | $171.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.5% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 23.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 6.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.00× | 1.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MAGN
| Other | $451.0M | 57% |
| United States And Canada | $341.0M | 43% |
TER
Segment breakdown not available.
