vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Mama's Creations, Inc. (MAMA) and MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Mama's Creations, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($47.3M vs $40.6M, roughly 1.2× MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp). Mama's Creations, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.1% vs -19.9%, a 21.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Mama's Creations, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (50.0% vs -20.7%). Mama's Creations, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.7M vs $-4.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Mama's Creations, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (33.0% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Mama's Creations, Inc. is a U.S.-based food manufacturing enterprise that produces a wide portfolio of refrigerated ready-to-eat and heat-and-serve food products, including Italian-style meatballs, sausages, pasta dishes, and other prepared meals. It mainly distributes its offerings to grocery retailers, mass merchandisers and foodservice partners across the United States, focusing on convenient, high-quality comfort food for daily consumer demand.
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
MAMA vs MX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $47.3M | $40.6M |
| Net Profit | $540.0K | $-8.1M |
| Gross Margin | 23.6% | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | 1.7% | -26.1% |
| Net Margin | 1.1% | -19.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 50.0% | -20.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 31.7% | 50.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $47.3M | $40.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.2M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.3M | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.6M | $44.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.5M | $51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.4M | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.8M | $46.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.7M | $43.4M |
| Q4 25 | $540.0K | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $323.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.0K | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $553.0K | $-13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $-15.4M |
| Q4 25 | 23.6% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.9% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.1% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.0% | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.6% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.2% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.0% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.3% | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | -26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | -25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | -14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.4% | -21.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | -19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | -31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | -17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | -35.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.03 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.03 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.03 | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $18.1M | $103.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $49.6M | $248.3M |
| Total Assets | $84.0M | $351.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.1M | $103.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.4M | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $113.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2M | $132.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.3M | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4M | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.0M | $162.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0M | $171.6M |
| Q4 25 | $49.6M | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.6M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.4M | $270.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.9M | $269.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.0M | $276.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $299.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | $305.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.6M | $321.9M |
| Q4 25 | $84.0M | $351.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.2M | $359.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.7M | $370.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.1M | $373.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.9M | $379.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.0M | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.2M | $412.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.1M | $426.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.9M | $5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.7M | $-4.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.8% | -11.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 25.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.16× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.0M | $-54.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.9M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $162.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-857.0K | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.7M | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.7M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-930.0K | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.0M | $-15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6M | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | -11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.2% | -16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | -77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.8% | -10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | -28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | -10.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 7.16× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.85× | -77.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.54× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.71× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.10× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.58× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.79× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MAMA
Segment breakdown not available.
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
