vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Mama's Creations, Inc. (MAMA) and Ouster, Inc. (OUST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ouster, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.2M vs $47.3M, roughly 1.3× Mama's Creations, Inc.). On growth, Ouster, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (106.6% vs 50.0%). Mama's Creations, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.7M vs $-37.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Ouster, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (54.8% CAGR vs 33.0%).
Mama's Creations, Inc. is a U.S.-based food manufacturing enterprise that produces a wide portfolio of refrigerated ready-to-eat and heat-and-serve food products, including Italian-style meatballs, sausages, pasta dishes, and other prepared meals. It mainly distributes its offerings to grocery retailers, mass merchandisers and foodservice partners across the United States, focusing on convenient, high-quality comfort food for daily consumer demand.
Ouster, Inc. is an American lidar technology company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It builds high-resolution, digital 3D lidar sensors for use in autonomous vehicles, industrial, robotics, drones, mapping, defense, and security systems.
MAMA vs OUST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $47.3M | $62.2M |
| Net Profit | $540.0K | — |
| Gross Margin | 23.6% | 60.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.7% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 1.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 50.0% | 106.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 31.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $47.3M | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.2M | $39.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.3M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.6M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.5M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.4M | $28.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.8M | $27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.7M | $25.9M |
| Q4 25 | $540.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $-22.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $-25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $553.0K | $-23.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $-23.8M |
| Q4 25 | 23.6% | 60.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.9% | 42.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.1% | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.0% | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.6% | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.2% | 38.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.0% | 33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.3% | 28.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | -61.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | -76.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | -73.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | -85.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | -98.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | -93.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.4% | -99.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | -55.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | -67.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | -91.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -88.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | -91.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.03 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.03 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.03 | $-0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $18.1M | $208.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $49.6M | $261.7M |
| Total Assets | $84.0M | $349.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.1M | $208.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.4M | $244.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $226.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2M | $168.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.3M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4M | $151.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.0M | $184.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0M | $187.8M |
| Q4 25 | $49.6M | $261.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.6M | $247.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.4M | $221.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.9M | $167.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.0M | $180.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $171.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | $170.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.6M | $167.2M |
| Q4 25 | $84.0M | $349.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.2M | $353.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.7M | $321.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.1M | $268.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.9M | $276.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.0M | $255.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.2M | $309.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.1M | $317.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.9M | $-15.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.7M | $-37.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.8% | -59.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 35.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.16× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.0M | $-64.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.9M | $-15.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $-18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-857.0K | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $-21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.7M | $-5.7M |
| Q4 25 | $3.7M | $-37.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-930.0K | $-5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.0M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5M | $-22.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6M | $-7.1M |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | -59.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.2% | -50.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.8% | -16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | -13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | -15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | -81.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | -27.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 7.16× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.54× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.71× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.10× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.58× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.79× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.