vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Massimo Group (MAMO) and TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (MITT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Massimo Group is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.0M vs $20.4M, roughly 1.0× TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.). TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 65.0% vs 9.5%, a 55.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.7% vs 15.7%). Over the past eight quarters, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (9.1% CAGR vs -16.5%).
Massimo Dutti, S.A. is a Spanish premium clothing retailer specializing in cashmere and wool products, established in 1985 and owned by Spanish multinational company Inditex, the parent company of Zara, Pull&Bear, and other brands.
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. is a real estate investment trust managed by global alternative asset firm TPG. It primarily invests in residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities, performing and non-performing mortgage loans, and other credit-linked real estate assets, with its core market being the United States. It generates returns via net interest income from holdings and strategic asset disposition gains.
MAMO vs MITT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.0M | $20.4M |
| Net Profit | $2.0M | $13.3M |
| Gross Margin | 41.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.1% | 67.1% |
| Net Margin | 9.5% | 65.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.7% | 17.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 215.0% | -7.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $0.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $21.0M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.0M | $19.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.9M | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9M | $18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.2M | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.6M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.4M | $16.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.2M | $17.2M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.7K | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.7M | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.5M | $16.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2M | $20.9M |
| Q4 25 | 41.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.1% | 67.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -18.2% | 54.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.4% | 76.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | 65.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 102.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.0% | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.5% | 82.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.8% | 111.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | 121.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | $0.27 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.04 | $0.47 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.00 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.05 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.08 | $0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.8M | $57.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $23.7M | $560.7M |
| Total Assets | $51.4M | $8.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.8M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6M | $59.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $88.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0M | $115.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | $118.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $102.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $120.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $100.3M |
| Q4 25 | $23.7M | $560.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.7M | $559.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.2M | $536.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.9M | $543.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.7M | $543.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.5M | $540.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.7M | $533.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.1M | $539.6M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.4M | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.9M | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.4M | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.9M | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.1M | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.9M | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.3M | $6.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.0M | $59.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.01× | 4.48× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.0M | $59.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $633.2K | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1M | $55.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.5M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-637.0K | $12.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-741.4K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -19.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.01× | 4.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | 0.87× | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.92× | 2.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.91× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.30× | 3.50× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.20× | 0.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
