vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Massimo Group (MAMO) and DNA X, Inc. (SONM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Massimo Group is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.0M vs $16.2M, roughly 1.3× DNA X, Inc.). Massimo Group runs the higher net margin — 9.5% vs -29.3%, a 38.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Massimo Group posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs 7.9%). Over the past eight quarters, DNA X, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (9.9% CAGR vs -16.5%).
Massimo Dutti, S.A. is a Spanish premium clothing retailer specializing in cashmere and wool products, established in 1985 and owned by Spanish multinational company Inditex, the parent company of Zara, Pull&Bear, and other brands.
MAMO vs SONM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.0M | $16.2M |
| Net Profit | $2.0M | $-4.8M |
| Gross Margin | 41.5% | 11.2% |
| Operating Margin | 13.1% | -24.5% |
| Net Margin | 9.5% | -29.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.7% | 7.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 215.0% | -89.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $-4.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.0M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.9M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9M | $16.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.2M | $15.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.6M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.4M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.2M | $9.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.7K | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $458.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.7M | $-21.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.5M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | 41.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.0% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.4% | 50.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.6% | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.2% | 28.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.5% | 25.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | -24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | -60.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -18.2% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.4% | 55.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | -15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | -56.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.2% | -29.5% |
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | -29.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | -66.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.5% | -141.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.8% | -16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | -57.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | -31.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.04 | $-4.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.00 | $-0.79 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.05 | $-116.99 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $-9.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $-1.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.08 | $-0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.8M | $2.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $23.7M | $-701.0K |
| Total Assets | $51.4M | $40.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $23.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.7M | $-701.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.2M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.9M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.7M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.5M | $15.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.7M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.1M | $19.8M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.4M | $40.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.9M | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.4M | $36.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.9M | $39.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.1M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.9M | $45.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.3M | $42.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.0M | $-7.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.01× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $633.2K | $-7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7M | $-417.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.5M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-637.0K | $-168.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $-554.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.7M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-741.4K | $-198.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.7% | -29.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.1% | -3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -19.0% | -29.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | -2.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.01× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -20.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.30× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.20× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
