vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) and Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

ManpowerGroup Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.7B vs $2.6B, roughly 1.8× Vertiv Holdings Co). Vertiv Holdings Co runs the higher net margin — 14.7% vs 0.6%, a 14.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vertiv Holdings Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.1% vs 7.1%). Vertiv Holdings Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($652.8M vs $168.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Vertiv Holdings Co's revenue compounded faster (16.5% CAGR vs 3.5%).

ManpowerGroup is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Founded in 1948 by Elmer Winter and Aaron Scheinfeld, ManpowerGroup is the third-largest staffing firm in the world behind Swiss firm Adecco and Dutch firm Randstad NV. The company provides administrative & support services, professional services, and business services through its four primary brands: Manpower, Experis, Right Management, and ManpowerGroup Solutions.

Vertiv is an American multinational provider of critical infrastructure and services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments.

MAN vs VRT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
MAN
MAN
1.8× larger
MAN
$4.7B
$2.6B
VRT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
VRT
VRT
+23.0% gap
VRT
30.1%
7.1%
MAN
Higher net margin
VRT
VRT
14.1% more per $
VRT
14.7%
0.6%
MAN
More free cash flow
VRT
VRT
$484.8M more FCF
VRT
$652.8M
$168.0M
MAN
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
VRT
VRT
Annualised
VRT
16.5%
3.5%
MAN

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
MAN
MAN
VRT
VRT
Revenue
$4.7B
$2.6B
Net Profit
$30.2M
$390.1M
Gross Margin
16.3%
37.7%
Operating Margin
1.7%
Net Margin
0.6%
14.7%
Revenue YoY
7.1%
30.1%
Net Profit YoY
34.2%
137.1%
EPS (diluted)
$0.65
$0.99

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
MAN
MAN
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$2.6B
Q4 25
$4.7B
$2.9B
Q3 25
$4.6B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$4.5B
$2.6B
Q1 25
$4.1B
$2.0B
Q4 24
$4.4B
$2.3B
Q3 24
$4.5B
$2.1B
Q2 24
$4.5B
$2.0B
Net Profit
MAN
MAN
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$390.1M
Q4 25
$30.2M
$445.6M
Q3 25
$18.0M
$398.5M
Q2 25
$-67.1M
$324.2M
Q1 25
$5.6M
$164.5M
Q4 24
$22.5M
$147.0M
Q3 24
$22.8M
$176.6M
Q2 24
$60.1M
$178.1M
Gross Margin
MAN
MAN
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
37.7%
Q4 25
16.3%
38.9%
Q3 25
16.6%
37.8%
Q2 25
16.9%
34.0%
Q1 25
17.1%
33.7%
Q4 24
17.2%
37.1%
Q3 24
17.3%
36.5%
Q2 24
17.4%
38.0%
Operating Margin
MAN
MAN
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.7%
20.1%
Q3 25
1.4%
19.3%
Q2 25
-0.6%
16.8%
Q1 25
0.7%
14.3%
Q4 24
1.6%
19.5%
Q3 24
1.6%
17.9%
Q2 24
2.2%
17.2%
Net Margin
MAN
MAN
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
14.7%
Q4 25
0.6%
15.5%
Q3 25
0.4%
14.9%
Q2 25
-1.5%
12.3%
Q1 25
0.1%
8.1%
Q4 24
0.5%
6.3%
Q3 24
0.5%
8.5%
Q2 24
1.3%
9.1%
EPS (diluted)
MAN
MAN
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$0.99
Q4 25
$0.65
$1.14
Q3 25
$0.38
$1.02
Q2 25
$-1.44
$0.83
Q1 25
$0.12
$0.42
Q4 24
$0.49
$0.38
Q3 24
$0.47
$0.46
Q2 24
$1.24
$0.46

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
MAN
MAN
VRT
VRT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$871.0M
$2.5B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.1B
$0
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.1B
$4.2B
Total Assets
$9.2B
$13.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.51×
0.00×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
MAN
MAN
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$2.5B
Q4 25
$871.0M
$1.7B
Q3 25
$274.6M
$1.4B
Q2 25
$289.8M
$1.6B
Q1 25
$395.0M
$1.5B
Q4 24
$509.4M
$1.2B
Q3 24
$410.9M
$908.7M
Q2 24
$468.9M
$579.7M
Total Debt
MAN
MAN
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$0
Q4 25
$1.1B
$2.9B
Q3 25
$468.3M
$2.9B
Q2 25
$470.3M
$2.9B
Q1 25
$971.4M
$2.9B
Q4 24
$929.4M
$2.9B
Q3 24
$999.7M
$2.9B
Q2 24
$961.7M
$2.9B
Stockholders' Equity
MAN
MAN
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$4.2B
Q4 25
$2.1B
$3.9B
Q3 25
$2.0B
$3.5B
Q2 25
$2.0B
$3.1B
Q1 25
$2.1B
$2.7B
Q4 24
$2.1B
$2.4B
Q3 24
$2.2B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$2.1B
$1.5B
Total Assets
MAN
MAN
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$13.4B
Q4 25
$9.2B
$12.2B
Q3 25
$8.4B
$10.8B
Q2 25
$8.5B
$10.4B
Q1 25
$8.0B
$9.5B
Q4 24
$8.2B
$9.1B
Q3 24
$8.5B
$8.9B
Q2 24
$8.5B
$8.1B
Debt / Equity
MAN
MAN
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
0.00×
Q4 25
0.51×
0.74×
Q3 25
0.23×
0.83×
Q2 25
0.24×
0.93×
Q1 25
0.46×
1.10×
Q4 24
0.44×
1.20×
Q3 24
0.46×
1.62×
Q2 24
0.45×
1.91×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
MAN
MAN
VRT
VRT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$178.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$168.0M
$652.8M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
3.6%
24.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.2%
4.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
5.92×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-161.4M
$2.3B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
MAN
MAN
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$178.9M
$978.9M
Q3 25
$59.8M
$508.7M
Q2 25
$-189.6M
$322.9M
Q1 25
$-153.2M
$303.3M
Q4 24
$247.6M
$425.2M
Q3 24
$83.5M
$378.2M
Q2 24
$-137.9M
$378.4M
Free Cash Flow
MAN
MAN
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$652.8M
Q4 25
$168.0M
$885.6M
Q3 25
$44.7M
$463.5M
Q2 25
$-207.2M
$277.9M
Q1 25
$-166.9M
$266.8M
Q4 24
$236.3M
$364.5M
Q3 24
$67.4M
$341.8M
Q2 24
$-149.8M
$344.3M
FCF Margin
MAN
MAN
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
24.6%
Q4 25
3.6%
30.8%
Q3 25
1.0%
17.3%
Q2 25
-4.6%
10.5%
Q1 25
-4.1%
13.1%
Q4 24
5.4%
15.5%
Q3 24
1.5%
16.5%
Q2 24
-3.3%
17.6%
Capex Intensity
MAN
MAN
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
4.2%
Q4 25
0.2%
3.2%
Q3 25
0.3%
1.7%
Q2 25
0.4%
1.7%
Q1 25
0.3%
1.8%
Q4 24
0.3%
2.6%
Q3 24
0.4%
1.8%
Q2 24
0.3%
1.7%
Cash Conversion
MAN
MAN
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
5.92×
2.20×
Q3 25
3.32×
1.28×
Q2 25
1.00×
Q1 25
-27.36×
1.84×
Q4 24
11.00×
2.89×
Q3 24
3.66×
2.14×
Q2 24
-2.29×
2.12×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

MAN
MAN

Other$2.4B52%
Transferred Over Time$1.1B24%
Staffingand Interim$1.0B22%
Productsand Services Other$50.8M1%
Permanent Recruitment$37.5M1%
Outcome Based Solutionsand Consulting$20.7M0%
Transferred At Point In Time$20.4M0%

VRT
VRT

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons