vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTERFACE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($331.0M vs $202.3M, roughly 1.6× MARA Holdings, Inc.). INTERFACE INC runs the higher net margin — 7.1% vs -14298.3%, a 14305.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INTERFACE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs -5.6%). Over the past eight quarters, MARA Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (10.7% CAGR vs -2.3%).
MARA Holdings, Inc. is an American digital asset technology and cryptocurrency mining company headquartered in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Founded in 2010, the company initially operated as a patent holding company before pivoting in the late 2010s to focus on blockchain infrastructure and digital assets.
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
MARA vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $202.3M | $331.0M |
| Net Profit | $-1.7B | $23.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | -11795.9% | 9.8% |
| Net Margin | -14298.3% | 7.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.6% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -423.5% | 81.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.25 | $0.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $202.3M | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $252.4M | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $238.5M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $213.9M | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $214.4M | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $131.6M | $344.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.1M | $346.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.7B | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $123.1M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $808.2M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-533.4M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $528.5M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-124.8M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-199.7M | $22.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2613.4% | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1065.0% | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -587.6% | 35.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | -11795.9% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.9% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -253.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -130.8% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -160.1% | 11.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -14298.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.8% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 338.9% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -249.4% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5367.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -94.8% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -137.6% | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.40 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.25 | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.27 | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.84 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.55 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.60 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.42 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.72 | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $547.1M | $61.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.6B | $196.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.5B | $634.6M |
| Total Assets | $7.3B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.04× | 0.31× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $61.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $547.1M | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $826.4M | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.5M | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $196.2M | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $391.8M | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.3M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.0M | $94.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $196.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $618.7M | $337.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $387.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $634.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $501.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $451.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.04× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.63× | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.47× | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.62× | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.59× | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.22× | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-802.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.2B | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -598.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 201.2% | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-2.0B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-802.7M | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-199.0M | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-163.4M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-215.5M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-677.0M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-160.1M | $76.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-115.2M | $21.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.2B | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-283.9M | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-282.4M | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-254.3M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-927.8M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-198.1M | $69.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-132.4M | $12.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -598.0% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -112.5% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -118.4% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -118.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -432.8% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -150.5% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -91.2% | 3.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 201.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.6% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 117.0% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.62× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.20× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.28× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MARA
Segment breakdown not available.
TILE
| AMS | $195.7M | 59% |
| EAAA | $135.4M | 41% |