vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP (MATW) and MATERION Corp (MTRN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MATERION Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($549.8M vs $284.8M, roughly 1.9× MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP). MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 15.3% vs 3.5%, a 11.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MATERION Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.8% vs -29.1%).
Matthews Aurora Funeral Solutions is one of the largest manufacturers of caskets and funerary urns in the United States, selling over 38% of the country's caskets as of 2005. The Aurora, Indiana–based company is a subsidiary of Pittsburgh-based Matthews International. The company makes both wooden and metal caskets and urns for holding cremated remains. It also provides supplies and consulting services for funeral homes.
Materion Corp. is a multinational company specializing in high-performance advanced materials. Among its products are advanced beryllium metals, thin film deposition materials, high-performance alloys and composites, specialty engineered beryllium, engineered metals, technical ceramics, tantalum, niobium, other precious and non-precious metals, inorganic chemicals, and specialty coatings.
MATW vs MTRN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $284.8M | $549.8M |
| Net Profit | $43.6M | $19.4M |
| Gross Margin | 35.0% | 14.9% |
| Operating Margin | 34.2% | 5.1% |
| Net Margin | 15.3% | 3.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -29.1% | 30.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1356.6% | 9.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.39 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $549.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $284.8M | $489.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $444.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $431.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $420.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $436.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $436.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $425.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $19.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | $6.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $25.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $25.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-48.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $19.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.39 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.4M | $16.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $529.8M | $489.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $543.2M | $957.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.98× | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $16.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | $13.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $489.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $529.8M | $460.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $458.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $427.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $453.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $443.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $957.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $543.2M | $943.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $934.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $910.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $887.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $868.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $931.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $907.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.98× | 0.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-52.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-57.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -20.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.19× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-52.0M | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $49.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $76.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $20.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-57.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-24.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -20.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.19× | 2.97× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.99× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
