vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP (MATW) and RISKIFIED LTD. (RSKD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($284.8M vs $234.0M, roughly 1.2× RISKIFIED LTD.). MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 15.3% vs -13.2%, a 28.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Matthews Aurora Funeral Solutions is one of the largest manufacturers of caskets and funerary urns in the United States, selling over 38% of the country's caskets as of 2005. The Aurora, Indiana–based company is a subsidiary of Pittsburgh-based Matthews International. The company makes both wooden and metal caskets and urns for holding cremated remains. It also provides supplies and consulting services for funeral homes.
Riskified is a publicly traded software company headquartered in Tel Aviv, Israel, with additional offices in New York City. The company provides software-as-a-service (SaaS) solutions focused on fraud prevention, chargeback management, and risk intelligence for e-commerce merchants.
MATW vs RSKD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $284.8M | $234.0M |
| Net Profit | $43.6M | $-30.8M |
| Gross Margin | 35.0% | 52.2% |
| Operating Margin | 34.2% | -19.0% |
| Net Margin | 15.3% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -29.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 1356.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.39 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $284.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $234.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $155.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $76.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $213.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $141.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $68.9M |
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-30.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-55.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-34.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-18.0M |
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 52.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 53.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 55.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 51.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 52.0% |
| Q4 25 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -19.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -20.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -32.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -31.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -33.4% |
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -26.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -24.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -26.1% |
| Q4 25 | $1.39 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.4M | $371.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $529.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $543.2M | $382.3M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $495.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.98× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $371.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $371.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $371.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $440.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $440.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $440.8M |
| Q4 25 | $529.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $543.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $382.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $382.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $382.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $491.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $491.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $491.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $495.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $495.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $495.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $601.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $601.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $601.9M |
| Q4 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-52.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-57.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -20.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.19× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-52.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-57.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -20.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.19× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
