vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP (MATW) and TANGER INC. (SKT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($284.8M vs $150.4M, roughly 1.9× TANGER INC.). TANGER INC. runs the higher net margin — 19.6% vs 15.3%, a 4.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TANGER INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.1% vs -29.1%).
Matthews Aurora Funeral Solutions is one of the largest manufacturers of caskets and funerary urns in the United States, selling over 38% of the country's caskets as of 2005. The Aurora, Indiana–based company is a subsidiary of Pittsburgh-based Matthews International. The company makes both wooden and metal caskets and urns for holding cremated remains. It also provides supplies and consulting services for funeral homes.
Tanger Inc. is a real estate investment trust headquartered in Greensboro, North Carolina, that invests in open air outlet and lifestyle shopping centers in the United States and Canada.
MATW vs SKT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $284.8M | $150.4M |
| Net Profit | $43.6M | $29.4M |
| Gross Margin | 35.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 34.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 15.3% | 19.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -29.1% | 11.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1356.6% | 47.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.39 | $1.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $150.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $284.8M | $151.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $145.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $140.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $135.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $132.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $133.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $129.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $29.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $24.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.05 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.39 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.4M | $227.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $529.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $543.2M | $697.8M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $2.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.98× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $227.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | $18.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $529.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $697.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $543.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $703.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $635.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $633.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $652.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $568.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $553.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.64× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-52.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-57.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -20.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | 6.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.19× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-52.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $74.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $82.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $41.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $65.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $72.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-57.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -20.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.19× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.32× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MATW
Segment breakdown not available.
SKT
| Rental revenue | $143.5M | 95% |
| Other revenue | $4.7M | 3% |
| Management, leasing and other services | $2.2M | 1% |
