vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP (MATW) and ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. (STKS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($284.8M vs $207.0M, roughly 1.4× ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.). MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 15.3% vs -3.1%, a 18.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-6.7% vs -29.1%). ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-329.0K vs $-57.2M).
Matthews Aurora Funeral Solutions is one of the largest manufacturers of caskets and funerary urns in the United States, selling over 38% of the country's caskets as of 2005. The Aurora, Indiana–based company is a subsidiary of Pittsburgh-based Matthews International. The company makes both wooden and metal caskets and urns for holding cremated remains. It also provides supplies and consulting services for funeral homes.
Target Hospitality is a company that provides workforce lodging and other temporary, modular housing used for oil, gas and mining operations; large-scale events; and disaster relief. Target Hospitality is based in The Woodlands, Texas, and also has offices in Williston, North Dakota; Denver, Colorado; Calgary, Alberta.
MATW vs STKS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $284.8M | $207.0M |
| Net Profit | $43.6M | $-6.4M |
| Gross Margin | 35.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 34.2% | 2.2% |
| Net Margin | 15.3% | -3.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -29.1% | -6.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1356.6% | -531.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.39 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $284.8M | $207.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $180.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $211.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $221.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $194.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $172.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $85.0M |
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-10.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $975.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-7.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.1M |
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 34.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | -3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -42.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.39 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.59 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.18 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.53 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.4M | $4.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $529.8M | $354.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $543.2M | $-75.8M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $884.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.98× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | $4.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $27.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $28.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $32.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.4M |
| Q4 25 | $529.8M | $354.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $355.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $347.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $348.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $348.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $349.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $350.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $73.5M |
| Q4 25 | $543.2M | $-75.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-61.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $40.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $45.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $68.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $68.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $884.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $879.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $935.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $956.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $960.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $953.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $945.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $309.3M |
| Q4 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.61× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.08× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-52.0M | $13.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-57.2M | $-329.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -20.1% | -0.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | 6.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.19× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-27.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-52.0M | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.2M | $-329.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-6.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $733.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $287.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-23.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-5.4M |
| Q4 25 | -20.1% | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 18.6% |
| Q4 25 | -1.19× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.76× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MATW
Segment breakdown not available.
STKS
| Benihanas | $111.3M | 54% |
| Steakhouse Restaurant | $59.2M | 29% |
| Grill Concepts | $32.3M | 16% |
| Other | $4.2M | 2% |
