vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP (MATW) and TIDEWATER INC (TDW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TIDEWATER INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.8M vs $284.8M, roughly 1.2× MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP). TIDEWATER INC runs the higher net margin — 65.3% vs 15.3%, a 50.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TIDEWATER INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.4% vs -29.1%). TIDEWATER INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($147.8M vs $-57.2M).
Matthews Aurora Funeral Solutions is one of the largest manufacturers of caskets and funerary urns in the United States, selling over 38% of the country's caskets as of 2005. The Aurora, Indiana–based company is a subsidiary of Pittsburgh-based Matthews International. The company makes both wooden and metal caskets and urns for holding cremated remains. It also provides supplies and consulting services for funeral homes.
Tidewater, Inc. is a publicly traded international petroleum service company headquartered in Houston, Texas, U.S. It operates a fleet of ships, primarily providing vessels and marine services to the offshore petroleum and offshore wind industries.
MATW vs TDW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $284.8M | $336.8M |
| Net Profit | $43.6M | $219.9M |
| Gross Margin | 35.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 34.2% | 19.0% |
| Net Margin | 15.3% | 65.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -29.1% | -2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1356.6% | 495.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.39 | $4.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $284.8M | $336.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $341.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $341.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $333.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $345.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $340.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $339.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $321.2M |
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | $219.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-806.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $72.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $36.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $46.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $50.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $47.0M |
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 34.2% | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 25.5% |
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | 65.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | $1.39 | $4.37 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.83 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.87 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.4M | $578.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $529.8M | $670.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $543.2M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.98× | 0.49× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | $578.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $428.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $369.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $341.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $324.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $280.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $315.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $280.9M |
| Q4 25 | $529.8M | $670.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $647.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $543.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.98× | 0.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-52.0M | $153.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-57.2M | $147.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -20.1% | 43.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.19× | 0.70× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $353.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-52.0M | $153.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $54.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $85.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $86.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $78.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $54.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.2M | $147.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $49.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $80.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $75.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $95.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $43.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $72.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $43.8M |
| Q4 25 | -20.1% | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | -1.19× | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
