vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP (MBCN) and REGENXBIO Inc. (RGNX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
REGENXBIO Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($30.3M vs $19.9M, roughly 1.5× MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP). MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP runs the higher net margin — 26.7% vs -221.3%, a 248.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, REGENXBIO Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.0% vs 18.3%). MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.4M vs $-52.8M). Over the past eight quarters, REGENXBIO Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (39.4% CAGR vs 13.7%).
Star Banc Corporation was a Cincinnati, Ohio-based regional bank holding company that acquired Firstar in 1998 and took the Firstar name; the merged bank acquired U.S. Bancorp in 2001 and took the U.S. Bancorp name. The company can trace its origins back to 1863 when it was first founded as the First National Bank of Cincinnati.
REGENXBIO Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology firm focused on gene therapy for rare severe genetic diseases. It licenses its proprietary AAV vector technology to global biopharma partners, and advances its own pipeline targeting ophthalmology, metabolic and neurodegenerative disorders.
MBCN vs RGNX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $19.9M | $30.3M |
| Net Profit | $5.3M | $-67.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 32.2% | -190.0% |
| Net Margin | 26.7% | -221.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.3% | 43.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 127.4% | -31.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.65 | $-1.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $30.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.9M | $29.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.5M | $21.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | $89.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.5M | $21.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.8M | $24.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.8M | $22.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.8M | $15.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-67.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3M | $-61.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2M | $-70.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8M | $6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | $-51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3M | $-59.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2M | $-53.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | $-63.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 70.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 72.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -190.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.2% | -176.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.9% | -296.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.9% | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.4% | -242.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | -256.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.8% | -251.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.4% | -408.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -221.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.7% | -208.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.0% | -331.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.8% | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.8% | -241.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.9% | -246.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | -237.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.9% | -405.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.65 | $-1.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.76 | $-1.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.60 | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.60 | $-0.99 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.29 | $-1.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | $-1.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.51 | $-1.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $230.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $224.1M | $102.7M |
| Total Assets | $2.0B | $453.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $230.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $274.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $323.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $267.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $234.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $255.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $290.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $338.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $102.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $224.1M | $161.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.1M | $213.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $213.8M | $274.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $210.6M | $259.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $210.7M | $301.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.8M | $348.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $205.6M | $390.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $453.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $525.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $581.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $490.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $466.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $519.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $569.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $629.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.8M | $-52.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.4M | $-52.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.0% | -174.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.2% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.91× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $32.0M | $-126.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-52.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $-56.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $-49.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $33.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.5M | $-31.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0M | $-40.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $-45.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4M | $-55.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-52.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $-56.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | $-49.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.7M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.7M | $-32.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8M | $-40.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | $-46.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3M | $-56.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | -174.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.0% | -189.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.5% | -232.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.9% | 36.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 95.6% | -154.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.7% | -168.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.3% | -206.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.9% | -358.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.66× | 5.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.60× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.31× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MBCN
Segment breakdown not available.
RGNX
| Novartis Gene Therapies | $24.2M | 80% |
| Nippon Shinyaku Collaboration And License Agreement | $4.3M | 14% |
| Nippon Shinyaku Services | $1.4M | 5% |
