vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Mondelez International (MDLZ) and Sea Ltd (SE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sea Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($22.9B vs $10.1B, roughly 2.3× Mondelez International). Sea Ltd runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs 5.6%, a 1.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sea Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (363.4% vs 8.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Sea Ltd's revenue compounded faster (147.8% CAGR vs 9.9%).
Mondelēz International, Inc. is an American multinational confectionery, food, holding, beverage and snack food company based in Chicago. Mondelez has an annual revenue of about $26.5 billion and operates in approximately 160 countries. It ranked No. 108 in the 2021 Fortune 500 list of the largest United States corporations by total revenue.
Sea Limited is a tech conglomerate headquartered in Singapore. It is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, with revenue of US$16.8 billion (2024). Sea currently functions as a holding company for Garena, Monee and Shopee, the largest e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia.
MDLZ vs SE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $10.1B | $22.9B |
| Net Profit | $564.0M | $1.6B |
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | 44.7% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 8.7% |
| Net Margin | 5.6% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.2% | 363.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 39.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $2.52 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $10.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.5B | $22.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7B | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.0B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.6B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | $564.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $665.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $743.0M | $375.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $641.0M | $414.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $402.0M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $853.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | 27.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.2% | 44.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.8% | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.7% | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.1% | 46.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.1% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.6% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 9.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.6% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.52 | $2.52 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.57 | $0.59 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.49 | $0.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.31 | $0.65 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.30 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.63 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.45 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.5B | $10.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $18.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $25.8B | $12.6B |
| Total Assets | $71.1B | $29.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.71× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $18.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $25.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.8B | $12.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.9B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | $71.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $71.5B | $29.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $68.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.5B | $22.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.67× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $467.0M | $5.0B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.83× | 3.12× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $467.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $717.0M | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $308.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $756.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $822.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $418.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $815.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $989.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $455.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.60× | 3.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.97× | 9.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.48× | 5.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.72× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.37× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
