vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Functional Brands Inc. (MEHA) and NSTS Bancorp, Inc. (NSTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NSTS Bancorp, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5M vs $1.7M, roughly 1.5× Functional Brands Inc.). NSTS Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 214.3% vs 15.3%, a 199.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. NSTS Bancorp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.9M vs $1.5M).
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is an American manufacturer of home and security products, headquartered in Deerfield, Illinois. Its portfolio of businesses and brands includes Moen and the House of Rohl; outdoor living and security products from Therma-Tru, Larson, Fiberon, Master Lock and SentrySafe; and MasterBrand Cabinets. Fortune Brands is a Fortune 500 company and part of the S&P 400 Index. As of December 31, 2021, the company reported employing approximately 28,000 associates and pos...
NSTS Bancorp, Inc. is a U.S.-based bank holding company. It offers a comprehensive suite of retail and commercial banking products and services, including deposit accounts, personal loans, commercial loans, and wealth management solutions, primarily serving individual consumers and small-to-medium enterprises in its regional operating areas.
MEHA vs NSTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7M | $2.5M |
| Net Profit | $259.0K | $135.0K |
| Gross Margin | 57.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -4.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 15.3% | 214.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 3.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 393.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $135.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0K | $65.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-258.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-328.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-46.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-171.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-326.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-246.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.6% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -71.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -14.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -12.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 214.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -71.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -14.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -12.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.04 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0M | $34.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $141.3K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $604.7K | $80.0M |
| Total Assets | $8.2M | $266.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.23× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $34.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $47.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $57.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $53.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $34.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $32.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $36.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.3K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $80.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $604.7K | $78.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $77.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $76.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $78.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $76.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $77.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $266.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.2M | $269.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $276.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $282.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $278.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $268.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $265.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $265.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.5M | $4.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.5M | $3.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 86.8% | 156.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.71× | 30.01× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $4.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $655.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $92.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $616.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $76.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 156.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 86.8% | 113.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -126.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 373.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 69.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -76.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.71× | 44.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
