vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of MetLife (MET) and Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

MetLife is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($600.0M vs $588.0M, roughly 1.0× Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.). MetLife runs the higher net margin — 134.8% vs 15.0%, a 119.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.1% vs 7.9%). Over the past eight quarters, MetLife's revenue compounded faster (2.0% CAGR vs -0.8%).

MetLife, Inc. is the holding corporation for the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MLIC), better known as MetLife, and its affiliates. MetLife is among the largest global providers of insurance, annuities, and employee benefit programs, with around 90 million customers in over 60 countries. The firm was founded on March 24, 1868. MetLife ranked No. 43 in the 2018 Fortune 500 list of the largest United States corporations by total revenue.

Simpson Manufacturing Company is a leading building materials manufacturer in the United States that produces structural connectors, fasteners, anchors, and products for new construction and retrofitting.

MET vs SSD — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
MET
MET
1.0× larger
MET
$600.0M
$588.0M
SSD
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
SSD
SSD
+1.2% gap
SSD
9.1%
7.9%
MET
Higher net margin
MET
MET
119.8% more per $
MET
134.8%
15.0%
SSD
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
MET
MET
Annualised
MET
2.0%
-0.8%
SSD

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
MET
MET
SSD
SSD
Revenue
$600.0M
$588.0M
Net Profit
$809.0M
$88.2M
Gross Margin
45.2%
Operating Margin
19.5%
Net Margin
134.8%
15.0%
Revenue YoY
7.9%
9.1%
Net Profit YoY
-36.3%
13.3%
EPS (diluted)
$1.18
$2.13

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
MET
MET
SSD
SSD
Q1 26
$588.0M
Q4 25
$600.0M
$539.3M
Q3 25
$621.0M
$623.5M
Q2 25
$604.0M
$631.1M
Q1 25
$611.0M
$538.9M
Q4 24
$556.0M
$517.4M
Q3 24
$554.0M
$587.2M
Q2 24
$558.0M
$597.0M
Net Profit
MET
MET
SSD
SSD
Q1 26
$88.2M
Q4 25
$809.0M
$56.2M
Q3 25
$896.0M
$107.4M
Q2 25
$729.0M
$103.5M
Q1 25
$945.0M
$77.9M
Q4 24
$1.3B
$55.4M
Q3 24
$1.3B
$93.5M
Q2 24
$946.0M
$97.8M
Gross Margin
MET
MET
SSD
SSD
Q1 26
45.2%
Q4 25
43.4%
Q3 25
46.4%
Q2 25
46.7%
Q1 25
46.8%
Q4 24
44.0%
Q3 24
46.8%
Q2 24
46.7%
Operating Margin
MET
MET
SSD
SSD
Q1 26
19.5%
Q4 25
13.9%
Q3 25
22.6%
Q2 25
22.2%
Q1 25
19.0%
Q4 24
14.8%
Q3 24
21.3%
Q2 24
22.1%
Net Margin
MET
MET
SSD
SSD
Q1 26
15.0%
Q4 25
134.8%
10.4%
Q3 25
144.3%
17.2%
Q2 25
120.7%
16.4%
Q1 25
154.7%
14.5%
Q4 24
228.6%
10.7%
Q3 24
242.2%
15.9%
Q2 24
169.5%
16.4%
EPS (diluted)
MET
MET
SSD
SSD
Q1 26
$2.13
Q4 25
$1.18
$1.34
Q3 25
$1.22
$2.58
Q2 25
$1.03
$2.47
Q1 25
$1.28
$1.85
Q4 24
$1.75
$1.31
Q3 24
$1.81
$2.21
Q2 24
$1.28
$2.31

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
MET
MET
SSD
SSD
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$25.6B
$341.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$28.4B
$2.1B
Total Assets
$745.2B
$3.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
MET
MET
SSD
SSD
Q1 26
$341.0M
Q4 25
$25.6B
$384.1M
Q3 25
$26.2B
$297.3M
Q2 25
$27.5B
$190.4M
Q1 25
$26.9B
$150.3M
Q4 24
$25.2B
$239.4M
Q3 24
$26.4B
$339.4M
Q2 24
$24.6B
$354.9M
Total Debt
MET
MET
SSD
SSD
Q1 26
Q4 25
$300.0M
Q3 25
$371.3M
Q2 25
$376.9M
Q1 25
$382.5M
Q4 24
$388.1M
Q3 24
$393.8M
Q2 24
$399.4M
Stockholders' Equity
MET
MET
SSD
SSD
Q1 26
$2.1B
Q4 25
$28.4B
$2.0B
Q3 25
$28.9B
$2.0B
Q2 25
$27.7B
$1.9B
Q1 25
$27.5B
$1.9B
Q4 24
$27.4B
$1.8B
Q3 24
$30.9B
$1.9B
Q2 24
$27.3B
$1.8B
Total Assets
MET
MET
SSD
SSD
Q1 26
$3.0B
Q4 25
$745.2B
$3.1B
Q3 25
$719.7B
$3.0B
Q2 25
$702.5B
$3.0B
Q1 25
$688.3B
$2.8B
Q4 24
$677.5B
$2.7B
Q3 24
$705.0B
$2.9B
Q2 24
$675.7B
$2.8B
Debt / Equity
MET
MET
SSD
SSD
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.15×
Q3 25
0.19×
Q2 25
0.20×
Q1 25
0.21×
Q4 24
0.21×
Q3 24
0.21×
Q2 24
0.23×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
MET
MET
SSD
SSD
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$7.1B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
8.75×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
MET
MET
SSD
SSD
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.1B
$155.7M
Q3 25
$3.6B
$170.2M
Q2 25
$2.2B
$125.2M
Q1 25
$4.3B
$7.6M
Q4 24
$4.6B
$115.8M
Q3 24
$4.2B
$103.3M
Q2 24
$3.5B
$111.1M
Free Cash Flow
MET
MET
SSD
SSD
Q1 26
Q4 25
$119.0M
Q3 25
$133.9M
Q2 25
$87.3M
Q1 25
$-42.6M
Q4 24
$60.3M
Q3 24
$58.1M
Q2 24
$70.9M
FCF Margin
MET
MET
SSD
SSD
Q1 26
Q4 25
22.1%
Q3 25
21.5%
Q2 25
13.8%
Q1 25
-7.9%
Q4 24
11.7%
Q3 24
9.9%
Q2 24
11.9%
Capex Intensity
MET
MET
SSD
SSD
Q1 26
Q4 25
6.8%
Q3 25
5.8%
Q2 25
6.0%
Q1 25
9.3%
Q4 24
10.7%
Q3 24
7.7%
Q2 24
6.7%
Cash Conversion
MET
MET
SSD
SSD
Q1 26
Q4 25
8.75×
2.77×
Q3 25
3.98×
1.58×
Q2 25
3.00×
1.21×
Q1 25
4.51×
0.10×
Q4 24
3.63×
2.09×
Q3 24
3.11×
1.10×
Q2 24
3.69×
1.14×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

MET
MET

Other$165.0M28%
Prepaidlegalplansandadministrativeonlycontracts$158.0M26%
Vision Fee For Service Arrangements$140.0M23%
Administrative Service$76.0M13%
Distribution Service$36.0M6%
Feebasedinvestmentmanagementservices$25.0M4%

SSD
SSD

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons