vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ferrari N.V. (RACE) and Rivian Automotive, Inc. / DE (RIVN), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ferrari S.p.A. is an Italian luxury sports car manufacturer based in Maranello. Founded in 1939 by Enzo Ferrari (1898–1988), the company built its first car in 1940, adopted its current name in 1945, and began to produce its current line of road cars in 1947. Ferrari became a public company in 1960, and from 1963 to 2014 it was a subsidiary of Fiat S.p.A. It was spun off from Fiat's successor entity, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, in 2016. The company currently offers a large model range which in...
Rivian Automotive, Inc., is an American electric vehicle manufacturer and automotive technology company founded in 2009. It produces an electric sport utility vehicle (SUV), a pickup truck on a "skateboard" platform that can support future vehicles or be adopted by other companies, and an electric delivery van, the Rivian EDV. It started deliveries of its R1T pickup truck in late 2021. The company planned to build an exclusive charging network in the United States and Canada by the end of 2023.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $874.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $-811.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-545.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-744.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -44.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -38.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -43.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -64.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -63.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -85.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -52.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -38.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -133.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -118.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -123.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -63.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -75.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -85.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -44.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -42.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -125.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -125.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -120.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.66 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.96 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.97 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.48 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.67 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.46 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.48 |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
