vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MGYR) and SuperCom Ltd (SPCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SuperCom Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.2M vs $8.9M, roughly 1.6× Magyar Bancorp, Inc.). SuperCom Ltd runs the higher net margin — 37.5% vs 35.4%, a 2.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Magyar Bancorp, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.0% vs -1.5%). Magyar Bancorp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.7M vs $-3.6M).
Magyar Bank is a bank based in New Brunswick, New Jersey with branches in Central Jersey.
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
MGYR vs SPCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.9M | $14.2M |
| Net Profit | $3.1M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 61.2% |
| Operating Margin | 48.3% | 16.3% |
| Net Margin | 35.4% | 37.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 19.0% | -1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.4% | 79.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.50 | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $6.3M |
| Q4 25 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-5.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 61.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 41.8% |
| Q4 25 | 48.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.5% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.1% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -12.2% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -49.9% |
| Q4 25 | 35.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.5% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -18.3% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -82.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.27 | $1.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.30 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-10.66 | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-1.54 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.1M | $15.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $49.1M | $23.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $121.7M | $37.3M |
| Total Assets | $1.0B | $65.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.40× | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.0M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $51.1M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $2.9M |
| Q4 25 | $49.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $32.9M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $32.3M |
| Q4 25 | $121.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $37.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.0M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $107.6M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $106.5M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $3.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $65.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $944.4M | $49.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $928.6M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $916.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $42.7M |
| Q4 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 9.49× | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 8.68× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.7M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.7M | $-3.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 41.4% | -25.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.17× | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $8.7M | $-14.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $-950.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $553.0K | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-4.1M |
| Q4 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $428.0K | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-4.4M |
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -25.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.5% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 39.4% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -31.5% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -70.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.17× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.00× | -0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 1.95× | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
