vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of M/I HOMES, INC. (MHO) and PERRIGO Co plc (PRGO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
M/I HOMES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.0× PERRIGO Co plc). M/I HOMES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 5.6% vs -127.8%, a 133.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PERRIGO Co plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.5% vs -4.8%). PERRIGO Co plc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($148.6M vs $-13.0M). Over the past eight quarters, M/I HOMES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (4.7% CAGR vs 1.3%).
M/I Homes, Inc. is a leading U.S. residential construction company that designs, builds and sells single-family homes, townhomes and duplexes across multiple U.S. states. It caters to entry-level, move-up and luxury homebuyers, offering energy-efficient designs, flexible floor plans and personalized customization options.
Perrigo Company plc is an American Irish-registered manufacturer of private label over-the-counter pharmaceuticals, and while 70% of Perrigo's net sales are from the U.S. healthcare system, Perrigo is legally headquartered in Ireland for tax purposes, which accounts for 0.60% of net sales. In 2013, Perrigo completed the sixth-largest US corporate tax inversion in history when it reregistered its tax status to Ireland to avoid U.S. corporate taxes. Perrigo maintains its corporate headquarters ...
MHO vs PRGO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $64.0M | $-1.4B |
| Gross Margin | 17.4% | 32.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.5% | -116.0% |
| Net Margin | 5.6% | -127.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.8% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -52.1% | -3093.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.42 | $-10.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $976.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $64.0M | $-1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.5M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $121.2M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.2M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $133.5M | $-44.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $145.4M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.7M | $-108.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $138.1M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | 17.4% | 32.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.5% | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.7% | 34.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.9% | 37.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | 33.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.1% | 37.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.9% | 37.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.1% | 33.1% |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | -116.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.9% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.8% | -2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.6% | -5.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | -127.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.4% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.4% | -0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.1% | -3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.7% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | -10.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.2% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | $2.42 | $-10.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.92 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.42 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.98 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.71 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.10 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.12 | $-0.79 | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.78 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $4.8B | $8.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $432.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $454.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $409.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $558.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $542.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $658.5M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $4.7B |
| Q4 25 | $4.8B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $10.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $9.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $10.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $10.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.7M | $175.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-13.0M | $148.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.1% | 13.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.14× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $127.7M | $145.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-8.7M | $175.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.4M | $51.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.8M | $75.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.9M | $-64.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.4M | $312.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-67.9M | $42.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.5M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $115.8M | $-1.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-13.0M | $148.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.0M | $29.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $56.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.5M | $-90.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.3M | $274.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-68.5M | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.0M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $115.5M | $-26.5M |
| Q4 25 | -1.1% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | -8.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 24.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | -1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.0% | -2.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | -0.14× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | 6.89× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.84× | -0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MHO
| Southern Homebuilding | $615.6M | 54% |
| Northern Homebuilding | $503.9M | 44% |
| Financial Service | $27.8M | 2% |
| Land | $4.7M | 0% |
PRGO
| Consumer Self Care Americas | $697.0M | 63% |
| Digestive Health | $123.9M | 11% |
| Nutrition | $108.3M | 10% |
| Healthy Lifestyle | $94.8M | 9% |
| Pain And Sleep Aids | $87.1M | 8% |
