vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of M/I HOMES, INC. (MHO) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.8× M/I HOMES, INC.). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 5.6%, a 10.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs -4.8%). Roper Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($507.0M vs $-13.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Roper Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs 4.7%).
M/I Homes, Inc. is a leading U.S. residential construction company that designs, builds and sells single-family homes, townhomes and duplexes across multiple U.S. states. It caters to entry-level, move-up and luxury homebuyers, offering energy-efficient designs, flexible floor plans and personalized customization options.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
MHO vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $64.0M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | 17.4% | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 6.5% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | 5.6% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.8% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -52.1% | 53.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.42 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $976.1M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $64.0M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.5M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $121.2M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.2M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $133.5M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $145.4M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.7M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.4% | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.5% | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.7% | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.9% | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.1% | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.9% | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.9% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.8% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.4% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.4% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.1% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.7% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.42 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.92 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.42 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.98 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.71 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.10 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.12 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $4.8B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.8B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-13.0M | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.1% | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.14× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $127.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-8.7M | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.4M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.8M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.9M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.4M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-67.9M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.5M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-13.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-68.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.14× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.31× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.58× | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.78× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.47× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.19× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MHO
| Southern Homebuilding | $615.6M | 54% |
| Northern Homebuilding | $503.9M | 44% |
| Financial Service | $27.8M | 2% |
| Land | $4.7M | 0% |
ROP
Segment breakdown not available.
