vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of M/I HOMES, INC. (MHO) and Teradyne (TER). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Teradyne is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.1× M/I HOMES, INC.). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 31.1% vs 5.6%, a 25.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Teradyne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (87.0% vs -4.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Teradyne's revenue compounded faster (32.6% CAGR vs 4.7%).
M/I Homes, Inc. is a leading U.S. residential construction company that designs, builds and sells single-family homes, townhomes and duplexes across multiple U.S. states. It caters to entry-level, move-up and luxury homebuyers, offering energy-efficient designs, flexible floor plans and personalized customization options.
Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.
MHO vs TER — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $64.0M | $398.9M |
| Gross Margin | 17.4% | 60.9% |
| Operating Margin | 6.5% | 36.9% |
| Net Margin | 5.6% | 31.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.8% | 87.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -52.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.42 | $2.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $769.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $651.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $976.1M | $685.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $752.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $737.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $729.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $398.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $64.0M | $257.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.5M | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $121.2M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.2M | $98.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $133.5M | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $145.4M | $145.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.7M | $186.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.4% | 57.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.5% | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.7% | 57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.9% | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.1% | 59.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.9% | 58.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.9% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.8% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.4% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.4% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.1% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.7% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 25.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.53 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.42 | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.92 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.42 | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.98 | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.71 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.10 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.12 | $1.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $241.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $0 |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | — |
| Total Assets | $4.8B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $241.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $293.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $272.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $339.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $553.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $510.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $421.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.8B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $3.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.7M | $265.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-13.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.14× | 0.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $127.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $265.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-8.7M | $281.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.4M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.8M | $182.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.9M | $161.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.4M | $282.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-67.9M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.5M | $216.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-13.0M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.0M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $131.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.5M | $97.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.3M | $225.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-68.5M | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.0M | $171.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.1% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 23.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 6.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.14× | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.31× | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.58× | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.78× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.47× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.19× | 1.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MHO
| Southern Homebuilding | $615.6M | 54% |
| Northern Homebuilding | $503.9M | 44% |
| Financial Service | $27.8M | 2% |
| Land | $4.7M | 0% |
TER
Segment breakdown not available.
