vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MIRA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (MIRA) and Solidion Technology Inc. (STI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MIRA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($15.7K vs $9.3K, roughly 1.7× Solidion Technology Inc.). MIRA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. runs the higher net margin — -7247.7% vs -43766.3%, a 36518.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
MIRA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical firm focused on researching, developing, and commercializing novel prescription therapies for rare diseases and unmet medical needs. It primarily serves global patient populations, prioritizing therapeutic areas with limited existing treatment options to improve patient outcomes.
Micron Technology, Inc. is an American producer of computer memory and computer data storage including dynamic random-access memory, flash memory, and solid-state drives (SSDs). It is headquartered in Boise, Idaho.
MIRA vs STI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.7K | $9.3K |
| Net Profit | $-1.1M | $-4.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 53.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | -18640.6% |
| Net Margin | -7247.7% | -43766.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -58.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 44.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.18 | $-1.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $15.7K | $9.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.8K | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $5.3K | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.3K | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $300 |
| Q3 25 | $-1.1M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $-1.7M |
| Q3 25 | — | 53.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 100.0% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 100.0% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | 100.0% |
| Q3 25 | — | -18640.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -44678.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -20816.3% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -109398.1% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | -580605.7% |
| Q3 25 | -7247.7% | -43766.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -52846.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5413.9% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -20885.8% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -109315.1% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | -580514.0% |
| Q3 25 | $-1.18 | $-1.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.5M | $160.5K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.5M | $-17.4M |
| Total Assets | $7.6M | $5.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $7.5M | $160.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $114.7K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $7.5M | $-17.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-14.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $4.7M |
| Q3 25 | $7.6M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $42.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $41.9M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $130.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.1M | $-351.8K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-1.1M | $-351.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-913.7K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-769.4K | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-777.0K | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $-1.4M |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
