vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Solidion Technology Inc. (STI) and Youxin Technology Ltd (YAAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Youxin Technology Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($39.4K vs $9.3K, roughly 4.2× Solidion Technology Inc.). Youxin Technology Ltd runs the higher net margin — -324.8% vs -43766.3%, a 43441.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Micron Technology, Inc. is an American producer of computer memory and computer data storage including dynamic random-access memory, flash memory, and solid-state drives (SSDs). It is headquartered in Boise, Idaho.
Youxin Technology Ltd is a China-based automotive digital service provider. It operates used car trading platforms, offers new car sales support, auto financing referrals, and after-sales resource matching for consumers and auto industry participants across mainland China, focusing on optimizing vehicle transaction efficiency.
STI vs YAAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.3K | $39.4K |
| Net Profit | $-4.1M | $-127.9K |
| Gross Margin | 53.8% | 67.9% |
| Operating Margin | -18640.6% | — |
| Net Margin | -43766.3% | -324.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.33 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $9.3K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0K | $39.4K | ||
| Q4 23 | $5.3K | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $1.3K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $0 | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $300 | — |
| Q3 25 | $-4.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.1M | $-127.9K | ||
| Q4 23 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-1.7M | — |
| Q3 25 | 53.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.8% | 67.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | 100.0% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 100.0% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | 100.0% | — |
| Q3 25 | -18640.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -44678.1% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -20816.3% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -109398.1% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | -580605.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | -43766.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -52846.5% | -324.8% | ||
| Q4 23 | -20885.8% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -109315.1% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | -580514.0% | — |
| Q3 25 | $-1.33 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.70 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-0.02 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $160.5K | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-17.4M | $-374.6K |
| Total Assets | $5.1M | $132.2K |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $160.5K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.7K | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $-17.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.1M | $-374.6K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $4.7M | — |
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $132.2K | ||
| Q4 23 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $42.6M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $41.9M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $130.5M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-351.8K | $-88.6K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-351.8K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-913.7K | $-88.6K | ||
| Q4 23 | $-769.4K | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-777.0K | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-1.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
