vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (MITT) and Valens Semiconductor Ltd. (VLN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($20.4M vs $17.3M, roughly 1.2× Valens Semiconductor Ltd.). TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 65.0% vs -42.2%, a 107.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.7% vs 8.1%).
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. is a real estate investment trust managed by global alternative asset firm TPG. It primarily invests in residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities, performing and non-performing mortgage loans, and other credit-linked real estate assets, with its core market being the United States. It generates returns via net interest income from holdings and strategic asset disposition gains.
Valens Semiconductor (Valens) is an Israeli fabless manufacturing company providing semiconductors for the automotive and audio-video industries. Valens provides semiconductor products for the distribution of uncompressed ultra-high-definition (UHD) multimedia content and in-vehicle connectivity applications. The company is a member of the MIPI Alliance and developed the first-to-market chipset that is compliant with the MIPI A-PHY standard. Valens invented the technology behind the HDBaseT s...
MITT vs VLN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.4M | $17.3M |
| Net Profit | $13.3M | $-7.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 63.0% |
| Operating Margin | 67.1% | -46.4% |
| Net Margin | 65.0% | -42.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.7% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.0% | 29.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.27 | $-0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $20.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.5M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.8M | $17.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.8M | $16.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.9M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.4M | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.5M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.6M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 63.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 63.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 62.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 56.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 61.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 67.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -46.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.9% | -43.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 54.6% | -56.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 76.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -76.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | -69.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 65.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 102.5% | -42.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.2% | -42.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.9% | -49.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 111.3% | -64.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.0% | -65.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 121.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.27 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.47 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.30 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.40 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.02 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.55 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $57.8M | $93.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $560.7M | $108.8M |
| Total Assets | $8.7B | $136.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $57.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.0M | $93.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.7M | $102.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.5M | $112.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $118.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.5M | $133.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $120.9M | $105.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $100.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $560.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $559.8M | $108.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $536.4M | $116.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $543.9M | $128.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $543.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $540.1M | $147.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $533.5M | $153.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $539.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0B | $136.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $144.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3B | $154.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | $171.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $175.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $59.6M | $-4.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-4.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -28.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.48× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-11.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $59.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.4M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5M | $-211.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.0M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7M | $-225.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-330.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-460.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -47.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.48× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.91× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.50× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.57× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
