vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. (MMLP) and Opera Ltd (OPRA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($187.7M vs $142.7M, roughly 1.3× Opera Ltd). Opera Ltd runs the higher net margin — 12.8% vs 1.7%, a 11.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Martin Midstream Partners L.P. is a U.S.-based midstream energy services provider. It offers storage, transportation, distribution and processing solutions for crude oil, natural gas liquids, refined petroleum products and specialty chemicals, mainly serving customers across North American energy and industrial segments.
Opera is a multinational technology corporation headquartered in Oslo, Norway, with additional offices in Europe, China, and Africa. Opera offers a range of products and services that include PC and mobile web browsers, GameMaker and gaming portals, the Opera News content recommendation products, the Opera Ads platform, and a number of Web3 and e-commerce products and services. The company's total user base is 296 million monthly active users.
MMLP vs OPRA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $187.7M | $142.7M |
| Net Profit | $3.2M | $18.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | 14.8% |
| Net Margin | 1.7% | 12.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -37.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $187.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $174.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $168.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $180.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $192.5M | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $171.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $170.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.5M | $211.6M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | $18.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | $34.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 57.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.5% | 14.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.5% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 16.1% |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-6.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $27.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | $-6.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-696.0K | — |
| Q1 26 | -3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.13× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MMLP
| Specialty products | $61.6M | 33% |
| Transportation * | $52.8M | 28% |
| Other | $46.5M | 25% |
| Terminalling and storage * | $22.4M | 12% |
| Sulfur services | $4.4M | 2% |
OPRA
Segment breakdown not available.
