vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MIND CTI LTD (MNDO) and SES AI Corp (SES). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MIND CTI LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.9M vs $4.6M, roughly 1.1× SES AI Corp). MIND CTI LTD runs the higher net margin — 19.4% vs -373.5%, a 392.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. MIND CTI LTD produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.0M vs $-11.1M).
MIND CTI Ltd. is a global provider of billing and customer care solutions and messaging services for voice, data, video and content services. Headquartered in Yokneam, Israel; the company also has offices in the United States of America, Iaşi in Romania and in Germany.
SES S.A. is a Luxembourgish communications satellite operator supplying video and data connectivity worldwide to broadcasters, content and internet service providers, mobile and fixed network operators, governments and institutions.
MNDO vs SES — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.9M | $4.6M |
| Net Profit | $950.0K | $-17.0M |
| Gross Margin | 55.4% | 11.3% |
| Operating Margin | 16.5% | -387.7% |
| Net Margin | 19.4% | -373.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 50.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $-0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.9M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.2M | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $5.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $950.0K | $-17.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $-20.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | $-22.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $1.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 55.4% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.3% | 51.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.6% | 73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 78.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.4% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 49.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | -387.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.8% | -262.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.0% | -652.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -401.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 20.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.4% | -373.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.9% | -293.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.3% | -642.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -214.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 25.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.16 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $0.06 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.3M | $29.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $23.0M | $214.8M |
| Total Assets | $30.2M | $272.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.3M | $29.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $56.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $16.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $23.0M | $214.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.3M | $228.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.3M | $249.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $269.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.5M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $24.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $30.2M | $272.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | $288.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.7M | $290.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $306.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.6M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $31.6M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.0M | $-10.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.0M | $-11.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 81.0% | -243.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 15.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.20× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.7M | $-61.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.0M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-22.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $4.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.0M | $-11.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $4.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 81.0% | -243.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.4% | -206.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.8% | -329.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -410.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 78.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 72.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 1.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.20× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.32× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.97× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 2.86× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.