vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MODINE MANUFACTURING CO (MOD) and Savers Value Village, Inc. (SVV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MODINE MANUFACTURING CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($805.0M vs $426.9M, roughly 1.9× Savers Value Village, Inc.). Savers Value Village, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -3.3% vs -5.9%, a 2.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MODINE MANUFACTURING CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.5% vs 8.1%). Savers Value Village, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-6.3M vs $-17.1M). Over the past eight quarters, MODINE MANUFACTURING CO's revenue compounded faster (15.5% CAGR vs 4.3%).
Modine Manufacturing is a thermal management company established in 1916 in the United States. The company started as Modine Manufacturing Company by Arthur B Modine who patented the Spirex radiator for tractors. The Modine company manufactured the Turbotube radiator for Ford Model T cars. The company built the world's first vehicular wind tunnel in Racine, Wisconsin in 1941. During WWII, Modine manufactured aftercoolers for the P-51 Mustang fighter plane. After WWII, Modine introduced the Ai...
Value Village Stores, Inc. was a Midwestern United States chain of retail stores aimed at the discount department-store market. Henry Horney, formerly of F.W. Woolworth Company founded a small, regional chain of discount stores located in the two states of Wisconsin and Illinois that opened in 1961 and operated into 1989. Horney also had a real estate company and often built small shopping malls adjoining the discount stores. The chain had no relation to the Savers Value Village chain of thri...
MOD vs SVV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $805.0M | $426.9M |
| Net Profit | $-47.4M | $-14.0M |
| Gross Margin | 23.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.1% | 8.5% |
| Net Margin | -5.9% | -3.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 30.5% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -215.6% | -164.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.90 | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $805.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $738.9M | $426.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $682.8M | $417.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $647.2M | $370.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $616.8M | $402.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $658.0M | $394.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $661.5M | $386.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $603.5M | $354.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-47.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.4M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.2M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.6M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.0M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.1M | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.3M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.8M | $-467.0K |
| Q4 25 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.2% | 25.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.6% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.4% | 24.2% |
| Q4 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.6% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.8% | 4.6% |
| Q4 25 | -5.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | -3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.3% | -0.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.90 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.83 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.95 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.92 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.76 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.86 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.88 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.48 | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $98.7M | $63.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $570.7M | $750.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $414.6M |
| Total Assets | $2.5B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.51× | 1.81× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $98.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.8M | $63.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $124.5M | $70.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.6M | $73.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $83.8M | $150.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.6M | $137.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.9M | $160.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.1M | $102.2M |
| Q4 25 | $570.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $525.8M | $750.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $482.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $296.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $330.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $359.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $405.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $399.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $414.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $423.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $910.2M | $413.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $855.1M | $421.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $858.8M | $432.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $788.4M | $419.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $747.6M | $395.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.50× | 1.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.53× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $24.7M | $21.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-17.1M | $-6.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.1% | -1.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | 6.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-20.3M | $25.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $24.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.7M | $54.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $54.8M | $419.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.7M | $55.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3M | $23.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.5M | $60.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.6M | $-5.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-17.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-30.5M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.0K | $21.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.1M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.7M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7M | $29.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.3M | $-28.3M |
| Q4 25 | -2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.1% | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.7% | -8.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.3% | 6.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.54× | 2.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.48× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.24× | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.86× | 6.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.53× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MOD
| Data Centers | $296.9M | 37% |
| Performance Technologies | $266.0M | 33% |
| Hvac Technologies | $107.1M | 13% |
| Air Cooled | $92.4M | 11% |
| Lb White | $25.6M | 3% |
| Climate By Design | $10.2M | 1% |
| Absolutaire | $7.0M | 1% |
SVV
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $408.3M | 96% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $18.6M | 4% |
