vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MOGU Inc. (MOGU) and Orion Properties Inc. (ONL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Orion Properties Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($35.2M vs $19.5M, roughly 1.8× MOGU Inc.). MOGU Inc. runs the higher net margin — -44.3% vs -101.7%, a 57.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Orion Properties Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-8.2% vs -12.4%).
Mogu Mogu is a brand of fruit-flavoured drink with pieces of nata de coco, produced by Thailand-based Sappe Public Company Limited and exported to many international markets, especially South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia and France.
MOGU vs ONL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $19.5M | $35.2M |
| Net Profit | $-8.6M | $-35.8M |
| Gross Margin | 0.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -71.6% | -101.5% |
| Net Margin | -44.3% | -101.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -12.4% | -8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -5.0% | -9.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $-0.63 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $35.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $37.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.5M | $38.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $38.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $39.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $40.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.2M | $47.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-35.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-69.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.6M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-32.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-33.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.2M | $-26.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -101.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -185.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -67.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -71.6% | -24.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -85.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -84.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -49.4% | -55.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -101.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -186.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -67.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.3% | -24.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -85.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -26.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -84.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -37.0% | -55.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.63 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.59 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.60 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $-0.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $52.3M | $22.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $465.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $70.1M | $623.2M |
| Total Assets | $118.3M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $32.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.3M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $58.2M | $23.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $465.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $483.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $483.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $505.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $492.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $485.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $462.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $471.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $623.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $658.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $728.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.1M | $753.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $763.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $800.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $816.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.5M | $854.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.0M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.55× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.4M | $23.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-10.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -55.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.4M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $54.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.6M | $11.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -55.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -84.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 58.7% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
