vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MOGU Inc. (MOGU) and Valneva SE (VALN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Valneva SE is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($36.2M vs $19.5M, roughly 1.9× MOGU Inc.). MOGU Inc. runs the higher net margin — -44.3% vs -54.1%, a 9.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Mogu Mogu is a brand of fruit-flavoured drink with pieces of nata de coco, produced by Thailand-based Sappe Public Company Limited and exported to many international markets, especially South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia and France.
Valneva SE is a specialty vaccine company registered in Saint-Herblain, France, developing, producing and commercializing vaccines for infectious diseases. It has manufacturing sites in Livingston, Scotland; Solna, Sweden, and Vienna, Austria; with other offices in France, Canada and the United States.
MOGU vs VALN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2023
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $19.5M | $36.2M |
| Net Profit | $-8.6M | $-19.6M |
| Gross Margin | 0.0% | 38.9% |
| Operating Margin | -71.6% | -49.5% |
| Net Margin | -44.3% | -54.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -12.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -5.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 25 | $19.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.2M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $36.2M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $93.2M |
| Q1 25 | $-8.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.2M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $-19.6M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | 38.9% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q1 25 | -71.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -49.4% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | -49.5% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -161.3% |
| Q1 25 | -44.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -37.0% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | -54.1% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $52.3M | $274.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $70.1M | $221.2M |
| Total Assets | $118.3M | $637.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 25 | $52.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $58.2M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $363.1M |
| Q1 25 | $70.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.5M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $221.2M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $100.7M |
| Q1 25 | $118.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.0M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $637.2M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $783.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.4M | $-26.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-10.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -55.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 25 | $-9.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.6M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $-26.3M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q1 25 | $-10.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.6M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q1 25 | -55.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -84.0% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q1 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 58.7% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
