vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MID PENN BANCORP INC (MPB) and SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MID PENN BANCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.0M vs $39.4M, roughly 1.6× SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC). SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC runs the higher net margin — 54.9% vs 31.4%, a 23.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MID PENN BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.8% vs 1.1%). MID PENN BANCORP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($71.8M vs $14.4M). Over the past eight quarters, MID PENN BANCORP INC's revenue compounded faster (21.1% CAGR vs 14.1%).
Commerce Bancorp was a Cherry Hill, New Jersey–based bank created in 1973. In 2007, it was purchased by Toronto-Dominion Bank, which merged Commerce into TD Banknorth, the latter of which was rebranded to TD Bank.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
MPB vs SD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $62.0M | $39.4M |
| Net Profit | $19.4M | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 43.6% | 38.5% |
| Net Margin | 31.4% | 54.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 30.8% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 47.0% | 23.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.83 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $62.0M | $39.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.8M | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.3M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.7M | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.4M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.3M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.1M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.3M | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | $19.4M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.3M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.7M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.3M | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.1M | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | 43.6% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.3% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.2% | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.1% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.8% | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.4% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.8% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | 31.4% | 54.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.6% | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 56.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.8% | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.9% | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.1% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.7% | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.7% | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.83 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.79 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.22 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.71 | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.72 | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.74 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.71 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.73 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $111.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $814.1M | $510.9M |
| Total Assets | $6.1B | $644.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $102.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $98.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $209.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $207.0M |
| Q4 25 | $814.1M | $510.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $796.3M | $492.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $775.7M | $480.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $667.9M | $464.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $655.0M | $460.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $573.1M | $446.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $559.7M | $424.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $551.0M | $419.7M |
| Q4 25 | $6.1B | $644.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3B | $619.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4B | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5B | $588.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | $581.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5B | $565.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | $529.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | $527.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $80.0M | $31.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $71.8M | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 115.8% | 36.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.3% | 43.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.12× | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $132.1M | $41.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $80.0M | $31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.3M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.0M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.5M | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.4M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.4M | $15.7M |
| Q4 25 | $71.8M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.3M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.2M | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.8M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.5M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.8M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.7M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.1M | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | 115.8% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.4% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.1% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.4% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 93.8% | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.1% | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.2% | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.5% | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | 13.3% | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.6% | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.12× | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.44× | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.08× | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.84× | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.88× | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.37× | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.53× | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.02× | 1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MPB
Segment breakdown not available.
SD
| Oil Reserves | $19.0M | 48% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $11.6M | 30% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $8.7M | 22% |