vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Mega Matrix Inc (MPU) and Rithm Property Trust Inc. (RPT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Mega Matrix Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.1M vs $3.4M, roughly 1.8× Rithm Property Trust Inc.). Rithm Property Trust Inc. runs the higher net margin — 95.4% vs -177.4%, a 272.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Rithm Property Trust Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-39.7% vs -40.9%).

Rithm Capital Corp. (Rithm) is an American investment management company headquartered in New York that focuses on real estate and alternative investments.

MPU vs RPT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
MPU
MPU
1.8× larger
MPU
$6.1M
$3.4M
RPT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
RPT
RPT
+1.2% gap
RPT
-39.7%
-40.9%
MPU
Higher net margin
RPT
RPT
272.8% more per $
RPT
95.4%
-177.4%
MPU

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
MPU
MPU
RPT
RPT
Revenue
$6.1M
$3.4M
Net Profit
$-10.8M
$3.2M
Gross Margin
47.7%
Operating Margin
-156.3%
99.6%
Net Margin
-177.4%
95.4%
Revenue YoY
-40.9%
-39.7%
Net Profit YoY
-291.1%
11.2%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.21
$-0.26

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
MPU
MPU
RPT
RPT
Q4 25
$3.4M
Q3 25
$6.1M
$4.0M
Q2 25
$7.1M
$4.2M
Q1 25
$7.7M
$249.0K
Q3 24
$10.3M
Q3 23
$1.1M
Q1 23
$540.0K
Q4 22
$1.4M
Net Profit
MPU
MPU
RPT
RPT
Q4 25
$3.2M
Q3 25
$-10.8M
$-273.0K
Q2 25
$-1.5M
$1.9M
Q1 25
$-2.5M
$-3.4M
Q3 24
$-2.8M
Q3 23
$-5.5M
Q1 23
$-7.4M
Q4 22
Gross Margin
MPU
MPU
RPT
RPT
Q4 25
Q3 25
47.7%
Q2 25
58.5%
Q1 25
55.8%
Q3 24
58.5%
Q3 23
Q1 23
Q4 22
Operating Margin
MPU
MPU
RPT
RPT
Q4 25
99.6%
Q3 25
-156.3%
-6.2%
Q2 25
-21.6%
45.7%
Q1 25
-32.8%
-1416.5%
Q3 24
-26.0%
Q3 23
-533.4%
Q1 23
-1346.5%
Q4 22
Net Margin
MPU
MPU
RPT
RPT
Q4 25
95.4%
Q3 25
-177.4%
-6.8%
Q2 25
-20.7%
45.1%
Q1 25
-32.0%
-1363.1%
Q3 24
-26.8%
Q3 23
-526.3%
Q1 23
-1369.3%
Q4 22
EPS (diluted)
MPU
MPU
RPT
RPT
Q4 25
$-0.26
Q3 25
$-0.21
$-0.03
Q2 25
$-0.04
$0.01
Q1 25
$-0.07
$-0.08
Q3 24
$-0.08
Q3 23
$-0.25
Q1 23
$-0.34
Q4 22

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
MPU
MPU
RPT
RPT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$9.8M
$79.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$37.4M
$291.6M
Total Assets
$42.7M
$1.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
MPU
MPU
RPT
RPT
Q4 25
$79.3M
Q3 25
$9.8M
$81.4M
Q2 25
$4.0M
$98.6M
Q1 25
$6.8M
$97.4M
Q3 24
$9.9M
Q3 23
$63.9M
Q1 23
$49.4M
Q4 22
$47.8M
Stockholders' Equity
MPU
MPU
RPT
RPT
Q4 25
$291.6M
Q3 25
$37.4M
$291.7M
Q2 25
$10.9M
$294.7M
Q1 25
$11.9M
$296.1M
Q3 24
$15.8M
Q3 23
$320.2M
Q1 23
$330.4M
Q4 22
$335.3M
Total Assets
MPU
MPU
RPT
RPT
Q4 25
$1.0B
Q3 25
$42.7M
$1.0B
Q2 25
$16.6M
$1.0B
Q1 25
$17.3M
$1.0B
Q3 24
$22.4M
Q3 23
$1.4B
Q1 23
$1.4B
Q4 22
$1.5B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
MPU
MPU
RPT
RPT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-3.5M
$-8.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-2.56×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
MPU
MPU
RPT
RPT
Q4 25
$-8.3M
Q3 25
$-3.5M
$-5.8M
Q2 25
$-1.8M
$-25.0K
Q1 25
$-2.2M
$-1.6M
Q3 24
Q3 23
$-10.7M
Q1 23
$-16.8M
Q4 22
$1.1M
Free Cash Flow
MPU
MPU
RPT
RPT
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q3 24
Q3 23
Q1 23
Q4 22
$1.1M
FCF Margin
MPU
MPU
RPT
RPT
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q3 24
Q3 23
Q1 23
Q4 22
80.6%
Capex Intensity
MPU
MPU
RPT
RPT
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q3 24
Q3 23
0.0%
Q1 23
Q4 22
2.0%
Cash Conversion
MPU
MPU
RPT
RPT
Q4 25
-2.56×
Q3 25
Q2 25
-0.01×
Q1 25
Q3 24
Q3 23
Q1 23
Q4 22

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons