vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) and OLD NATIONAL BANCORP (ONB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Monolithic Power Systems is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($804.2M vs $702.8M, roughly 1.1× OLD NATIONAL BANCORP). OLD NATIONAL BANCORP runs the higher net margin — 33.3% vs 24.0%, a 9.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OLD NATIONAL BANCORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (44.4% vs 26.1%). Over the past eight quarters, OLD NATIONAL BANCORP's revenue compounded faster (34.5% CAGR vs 25.9%).

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. is an American, publicly traded company headquartered in Kirkland, Washington. It operates in more than 15 locations worldwide.

Old National Bank is an American regional bank with nearly 200 retail branches operated by Old National Bancorp and based in Chicago and Evansville, Indiana. With assets at $48.5 billion and 250 banking centers, Old National Bancorp is the largest financial services bank holding company headquartered in Indiana and one of the top 30 banking companies in the U.S. Old National Bank has locations in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Tennessee, and Wisconsin.

MPWR vs ONB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
MPWR
MPWR
1.1× larger
MPWR
$804.2M
$702.8M
ONB
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
ONB
ONB
+18.2% gap
ONB
44.4%
26.1%
MPWR
Higher net margin
ONB
ONB
9.2% more per $
ONB
33.3%
24.0%
MPWR
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ONB
ONB
Annualised
ONB
34.5%
25.9%
MPWR

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
MPWR
MPWR
ONB
ONB
Revenue
$804.2M
$702.8M
Net Profit
$193.2M
$233.7M
Gross Margin
55.3%
Operating Margin
30.0%
Net Margin
24.0%
33.3%
Revenue YoY
26.1%
44.4%
Net Profit YoY
43.1%
61.5%
EPS (diluted)
$3.92

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
MPWR
MPWR
ONB
ONB
Q1 26
$804.2M
$702.8M
Q4 25
$751.2M
$580.8M
Q3 25
$737.2M
$574.6M
Q2 25
$664.6M
$514.8M
Q1 25
$637.6M
$387.6M
Q4 24
$621.7M
$394.2M
Q3 24
$620.1M
$391.7M
Q2 24
$507.4M
$388.4M
Net Profit
MPWR
MPWR
ONB
ONB
Q1 26
$193.2M
$233.7M
Q4 25
$171.7M
$216.6M
Q3 25
$179.8M
$182.6M
Q2 25
$135.0M
$125.4M
Q1 25
$135.1M
$144.7M
Q4 24
$1.3B
$153.9M
Q3 24
$144.4M
$143.8M
Q2 24
$100.4M
$121.2M
Gross Margin
MPWR
MPWR
ONB
ONB
Q1 26
55.3%
Q4 25
55.2%
Q3 25
55.1%
Q2 25
55.1%
Q1 25
55.4%
Q4 24
55.4%
Q3 24
55.4%
Q2 24
55.3%
Operating Margin
MPWR
MPWR
ONB
ONB
Q1 26
30.0%
Q4 25
26.6%
46.7%
Q3 25
26.5%
40.5%
Q2 25
24.8%
30.2%
Q1 25
26.5%
46.8%
Q4 24
26.3%
47.2%
Q3 24
26.5%
47.2%
Q2 24
23.0%
40.3%
Net Margin
MPWR
MPWR
ONB
ONB
Q1 26
24.0%
33.3%
Q4 25
22.9%
37.3%
Q3 25
24.4%
31.8%
Q2 25
20.3%
24.4%
Q1 25
21.2%
37.3%
Q4 24
201.8%
39.0%
Q3 24
23.3%
36.7%
Q2 24
19.8%
31.2%
EPS (diluted)
MPWR
MPWR
ONB
ONB
Q1 26
$3.92
Q4 25
$3.50
$0.55
Q3 25
$3.74
$0.46
Q2 25
$2.81
$0.34
Q1 25
$2.81
$0.44
Q4 24
$25.71
$0.47
Q3 24
$2.95
$0.44
Q2 24
$2.05
$0.37

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
MPWR
MPWR
ONB
ONB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.4B
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.7B
$8.5B
Total Assets
$4.4B
$73.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
MPWR
MPWR
ONB
ONB
Q1 26
$1.4B
Q4 25
$1.3B
$1.8B
Q3 25
$1.3B
$1.7B
Q2 25
$1.1B
$1.8B
Q1 25
$1.0B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$862.9M
$1.2B
Q3 24
$1.5B
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.3B
$1.2B
Stockholders' Equity
MPWR
MPWR
ONB
ONB
Q1 26
$3.7B
$8.5B
Q4 25
$3.5B
$8.5B
Q3 25
$3.4B
$8.3B
Q2 25
$3.2B
$8.1B
Q1 25
$3.1B
$6.5B
Q4 24
$3.0B
$6.3B
Q3 24
$2.4B
$6.4B
Q2 24
$2.2B
$6.1B
Total Assets
MPWR
MPWR
ONB
ONB
Q1 26
$4.4B
$73.0B
Q4 25
$4.2B
$72.2B
Q3 25
$4.1B
$71.2B
Q2 25
$3.9B
$71.0B
Q1 25
$3.7B
$53.9B
Q4 24
$3.5B
$53.6B
Q3 24
$2.9B
$53.6B
Q2 24
$2.6B
$53.1B

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons