vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) and Public Storage (PSA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Public Storage is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $751.2M, roughly 1.6× Monolithic Power Systems). Public Storage runs the higher net margin — 41.7% vs 22.9%, a 18.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Monolithic Power Systems posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.8% vs 3.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Monolithic Power Systems's revenue compounded faster (28.1% CAGR vs 2.5%).
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. is an American, publicly traded company headquartered in Kirkland, Washington. It operates in more than 15 locations worldwide.
Public Storage, headquartered in Glendale, California, is a real estate investment trust that invests in self storage. It is the largest brand of self-storage services in the US and owns approximately 9% of the self storage square footage in the U.S. As of December 31, 2024, the company operated 3,073 self-storage facilities containing an aggregate of 221 million net rentable square feet of space.
MPWR vs PSA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $751.2M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $171.7M | $507.1M |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 26.6% | 40.7% |
| Net Margin | 22.9% | 41.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.8% | 3.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -86.3% | -17.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.50 | $2.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $751.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $737.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $664.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $637.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $621.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $620.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $507.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $457.9M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $171.7M | $507.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $179.8M | $511.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.0M | $358.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.1M | $407.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $614.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.4M | $430.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.4M | $518.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.5M | $508.9M |
| Q4 25 | 55.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 55.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 26.6% | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | 42.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.8% | 30.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 34.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.5% | 36.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.0% | 44.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.9% | 44.3% |
| Q4 25 | 22.9% | 41.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 41.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | 29.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.2% | 34.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 201.8% | 52.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.3% | 36.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 44.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.2% | 44.0% |
| Q4 25 | $3.50 | $2.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.74 | $2.62 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.81 | $1.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.81 | $2.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.71 | $3.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.95 | $2.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.05 | $2.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.89 | $2.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $318.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $10.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.5B | $9.2B |
| Total Assets | $4.2B | $20.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.11× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $318.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $296.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $287.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $862.9M | $447.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $599.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $542.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $271.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $10.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.1B |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $9.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $9.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $9.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $9.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $9.9B |
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | $20.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $20.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $20.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $19.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $19.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $19.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $19.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $19.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.99× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.91× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $104.9M | $733.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $63.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.61× | 1.45× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $666.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $104.9M | $733.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $239.3M | $875.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $237.6M | $872.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $256.4M | $705.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.7M | $768.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.7M | $798.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.0M | $895.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $248.1M | $665.6M |
| Q4 25 | $63.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $196.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $216.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.61× | 1.45× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.33× | 1.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.76× | 2.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.90× | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.13× | 1.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 1.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.40× | 1.73× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.68× | 1.31× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MPWR
Segment breakdown not available.
PSA
| Self Storage Operations | $1.1B | 93% |
| Ancillary Operations | $86.9M | 7% |
