vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) and SEALED AIR CORP (SEE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SEALED AIR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $751.2M, roughly 1.9× Monolithic Power Systems). Monolithic Power Systems runs the higher net margin — 22.9% vs 3.1%, a 19.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Monolithic Power Systems posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.8% vs 2.6%). SEALED AIR CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($257.7M vs $63.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Monolithic Power Systems's revenue compounded faster (28.1% CAGR vs 2.7%).
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. is an American, publicly traded company headquartered in Kirkland, Washington. It operates in more than 15 locations worldwide.
Sealed Air Corporation is a global provider of innovative packaging and protective solutions. Its core offerings include cushioning materials, food safety and preservation packaging, and sustainable waste-reducing packaging systems, serving retail, e-commerce, food and beverage, and industrial manufacturing markets worldwide.
MPWR vs SEE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $751.2M | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $171.7M | $43.8M |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 28.6% |
| Operating Margin | 26.6% | 11.4% |
| Net Margin | 22.9% | 3.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.8% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -86.3% | 700.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.50 | $0.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $751.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $737.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $664.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $637.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $621.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $620.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $507.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $457.9M | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $171.7M | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $179.8M | $255.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.0M | $93.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.1M | $113.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $-7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.4M | $91.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.4M | $98.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.5M | $82.0M |
| Q4 25 | 55.2% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.1% | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.1% | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.4% | 30.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.4% | 30.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.4% | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.3% | 31.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 55.1% | 30.3% |
| Q4 25 | 26.6% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.8% | 15.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.5% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.0% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.9% | 14.0% |
| Q4 25 | 22.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.2% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 201.8% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.2% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | $3.50 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.74 | $1.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.81 | $0.63 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.81 | $0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.71 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.95 | $0.63 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.05 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.89 | $0.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $344.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.5B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $4.2B | $7.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 2.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $344.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $282.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $354.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $335.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $862.9M | $371.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $386.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $388.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $352.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.5B |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $953.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $797.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $624.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $771.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $650.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $598.3M |
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $7.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $7.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.49× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $104.9M | $293.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $63.9M | $257.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.5% | 18.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | 2.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.61× | 6.70× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $666.2M | $458.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $104.9M | $293.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $239.3M | $165.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $237.6M | $136.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $256.4M | $31.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.7M | $244.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.7M | $170.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.0M | $188.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $248.1M | $125.1M |
| Q4 25 | $63.9M | $257.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $196.8M | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.5M | $93.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $216.0M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.9M | $185.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.9M | $115.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.5M | $129.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.1M | $78.0M |
| Q4 25 | 8.5% | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.7% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | -0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.5% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.9% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.7% | 5.9% |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.61× | 6.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.33× | 0.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.76× | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.90× | 0.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 1.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.40× | 1.91× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.68× | 1.53× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MPWR
Segment breakdown not available.
SEE
| Protective Segment | $1.1B | 78% |
| Other | $292.0M | 21% |
| Pension Plans Defined Benefit | $7.9M | 1% |
