vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) and SM Energy Co (SM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Monolithic Power Systems is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($751.2M vs $704.9M, roughly 1.1× SM Energy Co). On growth, Monolithic Power Systems posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.8% vs -17.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Monolithic Power Systems's revenue compounded faster (28.1% CAGR vs 12.2%).
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. is an American, publicly traded company headquartered in Kirkland, Washington. It operates in more than 15 locations worldwide.
SM Energy Company is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Denver, Colorado.
MPWR vs SM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $751.2M | $704.9M |
| Net Profit | $171.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 26.6% | 25.9% |
| Net Margin | 22.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 20.8% | -17.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -86.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.50 | $0.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $751.2M | $704.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $737.2M | $811.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $664.6M | $792.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $637.6M | $844.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $621.7M | $852.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $620.1M | $643.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $507.4M | $634.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $457.9M | $559.9M |
| Q4 25 | $171.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $179.8M | $155.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.0M | $201.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.1M | $182.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.4M | $240.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.4M | $210.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.5M | $131.2M |
| Q4 25 | 55.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 55.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 26.6% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.8% | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | 33.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.5% | 51.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.0% | 44.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.9% | 31.9% |
| Q4 25 | 22.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.2% | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 201.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.3% | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.2% | 23.4% |
| Q4 25 | $3.50 | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.74 | $1.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.81 | $1.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.81 | $1.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.71 | $1.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.95 | $2.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.05 | $1.82 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.89 | $1.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $368.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.5B | $4.8B |
| Total Assets | $4.2B | $9.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $368.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $54.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $862.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $487.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $506.3M |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $3.7B |
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $9.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $6.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $6.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $104.9M | $451.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $63.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.61× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $666.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $104.9M | $451.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $239.3M | $505.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $237.6M | $571.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $256.4M | $483.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.7M | $578.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.7M | $452.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.0M | $476.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $248.1M | $276.0M |
| Q4 25 | $63.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $196.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $216.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.33× | 3.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.76× | 2.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.90× | 2.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 1.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.40× | 2.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.68× | 2.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
