vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) and Symbotic Inc. (SYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Monolithic Power Systems is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($751.2M vs $630.0M, roughly 1.2× Symbotic Inc.). Monolithic Power Systems runs the higher net margin — 22.9% vs 0.4%, a 22.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Symbotic Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.4% vs 20.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Monolithic Power Systems's revenue compounded faster (28.1% CAGR vs 21.9%).
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. is an American, publicly traded company headquartered in Kirkland, Washington. It operates in more than 15 locations worldwide.
Symbotic Inc. is an American robotics warehouse automation company based in Wilmington, Massachusetts.
MPWR vs SYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $751.2M | $630.0M |
| Net Profit | $171.7M | $2.6M |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 21.2% |
| Operating Margin | 26.6% | 1.0% |
| Net Margin | 22.9% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.8% | 29.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -86.3% | 174.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.50 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $751.2M | $630.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $737.2M | $618.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $664.6M | $592.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $637.6M | $549.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $621.7M | $486.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $620.1M | $503.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $507.4M | $491.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $457.9M | $424.3M |
| Q4 25 | $171.7M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $179.8M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.0M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.1M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $-3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.4M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.4M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.5M | $-6.6M |
| Q4 25 | 55.2% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.1% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.1% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.4% | 19.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.4% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.4% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.3% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 55.1% | 10.4% |
| Q4 25 | 26.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | -3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.8% | -6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | -5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.5% | -4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.0% | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.9% | -12.0% |
| Q4 25 | 22.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.2% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 201.8% | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.3% | -0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | -0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.2% | -1.6% |
| Q4 25 | $3.50 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.74 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.81 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.81 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.71 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.95 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.05 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.89 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $1.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.5B | $663.8M |
| Total Assets | $4.2B | $3.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $777.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $954.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $862.9M | $903.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $727.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $870.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $901.4M |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $663.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $221.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $210.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $205.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $196.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $197.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $418.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $417.1M |
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $1.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $104.9M | $191.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $63.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.61× | 73.61× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $666.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $104.9M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $239.3M | $530.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $237.6M | $-138.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $256.4M | $269.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.7M | $205.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.7M | $-99.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.0M | $50.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $248.1M | $21.1M |
| Q4 25 | $63.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $196.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $216.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.9M | $197.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.9M | $-120.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.5M | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.1M | $18.6M |
| Q4 25 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.5% | 40.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.9% | -23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.7% | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.61× | 73.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.76× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.90× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.68× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MPWR
Segment breakdown not available.
SYM
| Systems | $590.3M | 94% |
| Operation Services | $28.8M | 5% |
| Software Maintenance And Support | $10.9M | 2% |
| Revision Of Prior Period Change In Accounting Principle Adjustment | $2.9M | 0% |
| Related Party | $1.1M | 0% |
