vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) and UPBOUND GROUP, INC. (UPBD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UPBOUND GROUP, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $751.2M, roughly 1.6× Monolithic Power Systems). Monolithic Power Systems runs the higher net margin — 22.9% vs 1.7%, a 21.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Monolithic Power Systems posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.8% vs 10.9%). Monolithic Power Systems produced more free cash flow last quarter ($63.9M vs $24.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Monolithic Power Systems's revenue compounded faster (28.1% CAGR vs 4.5%).
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. is an American, publicly traded company headquartered in Kirkland, Washington. It operates in more than 15 locations worldwide.
Upbound Group, Inc. is a leading US provider of flexible lease-to-own solutions for consumer goods. It offers furniture, consumer electronics, home appliances, and accessories, catering to customers seeking accessible payment alternatives to traditional retail financing.
MPWR vs UPBD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $751.2M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $171.7M | $19.7M |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 49.0% |
| Operating Margin | 26.6% | 4.8% |
| Net Margin | 22.9% | 1.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.8% | 10.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -86.3% | -36.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.50 | $0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $751.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $737.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $664.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $637.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $621.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $620.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $507.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $457.9M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $171.7M | $19.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $179.8M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.0M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.1M | $24.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.4M | $30.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.4M | $33.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.5M | $27.7M |
| Q4 25 | 55.2% | 49.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.1% | 48.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.1% | 49.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.4% | 46.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.4% | 47.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.4% | 47.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.3% | 49.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 55.1% | 48.3% |
| Q4 25 | 26.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.8% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.5% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.0% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.9% | 5.6% |
| Q4 25 | 22.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 201.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.2% | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | $3.50 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.74 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.81 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.81 | $0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.71 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.95 | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.05 | $0.61 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.89 | $0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $120.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.5B | $695.7M |
| Total Assets | $4.2B | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $120.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $107.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $106.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $107.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $862.9M | $60.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $85.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $82.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $84.8M |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $695.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $687.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $685.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $679.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $629.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $611.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $596.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $578.3M |
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $2.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $104.9M | $41.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $63.9M | $24.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.5% | 2.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.61× | 2.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $666.2M | $238.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $104.9M | $41.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $239.3M | $118.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $237.6M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $256.4M | $137.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.7M | $-61.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.7M | $106.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.0M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $248.1M | $45.4M |
| Q4 25 | $63.9M | $24.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $196.8M | $97.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.5M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $216.0M | $127.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.9M | $-74.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.9M | $88.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.5M | $613.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.1M | $33.6M |
| Q4 25 | 8.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.7% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.5% | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.9% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.7% | 3.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.61× | 2.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.33× | 8.96× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.76× | 0.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.90× | 5.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.13× | -2.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 3.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.40× | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.68× | 1.64× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
