vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Medirom Healthcare Technologies Inc. (MRM) and Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($37.8M vs $21.1M, roughly 1.8× Medirom Healthcare Technologies Inc.). Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.1% vs -21.3%, a 21.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Medirom Healthcare Technologies Inc. develops and delivers integrated digital health and remote patient monitoring solutions targeted at chronic disease management, post-operative care, and senior health support. It serves healthcare providers, insurance payers, and institutional care partners across key markets in North America and the Asia-Pacific region, prioritizing accessible, data-driven care to improve patient outcomes.
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. is a specialty insurance holding company that offers a broad portfolio of property and casualty insurance products, with a core focus on residential and commercial flood insurance for customers across the United States. It serves both individual consumers and small to mid-sized business clients, using advanced data analytics to support accurate policy pricing and robust risk management.
MRM vs NP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.1M | $37.8M |
| Net Profit | $-4.5M | $50.0K |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -28.5% | — |
| Net Margin | -21.3% | 0.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 28.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 0.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $37.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $50.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 46.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 58.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $252.3K | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6M | — |
| Total Assets | $52.0M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 5.55× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $252.3K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $247.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-509.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-374.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $89.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.55× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.3K | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.4K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $38.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.4K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.38× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MRM
| Professional services expense | $20.0M | 95% |
| Other | $1.1M | 5% |
NP
Segment breakdown not available.
