vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC. (MRSH) and SMITHFIELD FOODS INC (SFD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.6B vs $3.8B, roughly 1.7× SMITHFIELD FOODS INC). MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 12.4% vs 6.6%, a 5.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.7% vs 0.8%). Over the past eight quarters, SMITHFIELD FOODS INC's revenue compounded faster (6.8% CAGR vs 0.9%).
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., doing business as Marsh McLennan and Marsh, is a global professional services firm, headquartered in New York City with businesses in insurance brokerage, risk management, reinsurance services, talent management, investment advisory, and management consulting. Its four main operating companies are Marsh, which offers risk management, insurance broking, insurance program management, risk consulting, analytical modeling and alternative risk financing services; ...
Smithfield Foods, Inc., is a Hong Kong-owned pork producer and food-processing company based in Smithfield, Virginia. Founded in 1936 as the Smithfield Packing Company by Joseph W. Luter and his son, the company is the largest pig and pork producer in the world. In addition to owning over 500 farms in the US, Smithfield contracts with another 2,000 independent farms around the country to raise Smithfield's pigs. Outside the US, the company has facilities in Mexico, Poland, Romania, Germany, S...
MRSH vs SFD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2027
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.6B | $3.8B |
| Net Profit | $821.0M | $249.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 13.4% |
| Operating Margin | 18.5% | 8.8% |
| Net Margin | 12.4% | 6.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.7% | 0.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4.2% | 9.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.68 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.6B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $249.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $821.0M | $327.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $747.0M | $248.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $188.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $224.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $788.0M | $205.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $747.0M | $291.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.5% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.4% | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.8% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.4% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.8% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.4% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.6% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.68 | $0.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.51 | $0.63 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.45 | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.79 | $0.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.58 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.51 | $0.77 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.27 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.7B | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $19.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $15.3B | $6.9B |
| Total Assets | $58.7B | $12.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.28× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.3B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.4B | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.0B | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.3B | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5B | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $12.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $58.7B | $12.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.8B | $11.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.6B | $11.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.0B | $11.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.5B | $11.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.28× | 0.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.27× | 0.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.23× | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.37× | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.47× | 0.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.93× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.94× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.2B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.1B | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 31.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.63× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $5.0B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $938.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $274.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-622.0M | $-166.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $842.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $-75.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $196.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-677.0M | $-245.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.2% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.6% | -2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.1% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.6% | -6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.63× | 2.87× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.79× | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.38× | 1.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.45× | -0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.48× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MRSH
| Marsh Insurance Group | $3.6B | 55% |
| Consulting Segment | $2.6B | 40% |
| Guy Carpenter Reinsurance Group | $179.0M | 3% |
| Other | $175.0M | 3% |
SFD
Segment breakdown not available.
