vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) and Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Restaurant Brands International Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.3B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.0× Marvell Technology, Inc.). Restaurant Brands International Inc. runs the higher net margin — 19.7% vs 17.9%, a 1.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Marvell Technology, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (22.1% vs 7.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Marvell Technology, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (38.2% CAGR vs 4.3%).
Marvell Technology, Inc. is an American company, headquartered in Santa Clara, California, which develops and produces semiconductors and related technology. Founded in 1995, the company had more than 6,500 employees as of 2024, with over 10,000 patents worldwide, and an annual revenue of $5.5 billion for fiscal 2024.
Restaurant Brands International Inc. (RBI) is an American-Canadian multinational fast food holding company. It was formed in 2014 by the $12.5 billion merger between American fast food restaurant chain Burger King and Canadian coffee shop and restaurant chain Tim Hortons, and expanded by the purchases of Popeyes and Firehouse Subs in 2017 and 2021, respectively. The company is the fifth-largest operator of fast food restaurants in the world after Subway, McDonald's, Starbucks and Yum! Brands....
MRVL vs QSR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2027 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $2.3B |
| Net Profit | $396.1M | $445.0M |
| Gross Margin | 51.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 66.5% | 0.0% |
| Net Margin | 17.9% | 19.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 22.1% | 7.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.46 | $0.97 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $396.1M | $445.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $155.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $194.8M | $436.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.9M | $263.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $200.2M | $221.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-676.3M | $361.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-193.3M | $357.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-215.6M | $399.0M |
| Q1 26 | 51.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 51.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 66.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.2% | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | 20.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.9% | 20.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.4% | 27.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.9% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.1% | 31.9% |
| Q1 26 | 17.9% | 19.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 91.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.4% | 10.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -44.6% | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.2% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.6% | 19.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.46 | $0.97 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.20 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $0.96 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $0.57 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.23 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.78 | $0.79 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.25 | $0.88 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.6B | $1.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.5B | $13.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $14.3B | $5.3B |
| Total Assets | $22.3B | $24.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.31× | 2.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $885.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $948.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $868.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $808.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $847.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | $4.5B | $13.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $13.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | $13.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $13.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $13.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $13.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | $13.7B |
| Q1 26 | $14.3B | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.1B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.3B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.4B | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.4B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.5B | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | $22.3B | $24.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.6B | $25.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.6B | $25.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.0B | $25.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.2B | $24.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.7B | $24.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.3B | $25.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.5B | $24.8B |
| Q1 26 | 0.31× | 2.51× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.32× | 3.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.33× | 3.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.32× | 4.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.30× | 4.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.31× | 4.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.29× | 4.22× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.29× | 4.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $373.7M | $227.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $169.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.94× | 0.51× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $373.7M | $227.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $582.3M | $555.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $461.6M | $592.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $332.9M | $449.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $514.0M | $118.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $536.3M | $481.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $306.4M | $540.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $324.5M | $334.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $169.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $508.8M | $453.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.1M | $531.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $214.1M | $411.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $444.1M | $54.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $461.3M | $404.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $258.2M | $485.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $233.0M | $291.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.5% | 18.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.6% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.4% | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.1% | 14.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | 2.1% |
| Q1 26 | 0.94× | 0.51× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.31× | 3.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.37× | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | 1.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.57× | 0.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MRVL
| Data center | $1.7B | 74% |
| Communications and other | $567.4M | 26% |
QSR
| TH | $997.0M | 44% |
| RH | $448.0M | 20% |
| BK | $365.0M | 16% |
| INTL | $254.0M | 11% |
| PLK | $190.0M | 8% |
| FHS | $60.0M | 3% |
