vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Morgan Stanley (MS) and Northrop Grumman (NOC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Morgan Stanley is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($10.7B vs $9.9B, roughly 1.1× Northrop Grumman). Morgan Stanley runs the higher net margin — 52.6% vs 8.9%, a 43.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Morgan Stanley posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.0% vs 4.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Northrop Grumman's revenue compounded faster (-1.7% CAGR vs -15.8%).

Morgan Stanley is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered at 1585 Broadway in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. With offices in 42 countries and more than 80,000 employees, the firm's clients include corporations, governments, institutions, and individuals. Morgan Stanley ranked No. 61 in the 2023 Fortune 500 list of the largest United States corporations by total revenue and in the same year ranked No. 30 in the Forbes Global 2000.

Northrop Grumman Corporation, headquartered in West Falls Church, Virginia, is an American aerospace and defense company that designs and manufactures systems for aeronautics, defense, missions, and space. The company is the 5th largest contractor of the U.S. federal government; it receives over 2% of total spending by the federal government of the United States on contractors.

MS vs NOC — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
MS
MS
1.1× larger
MS
$10.7B
$9.9B
NOC
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
MS
MS
+11.7% gap
MS
16.0%
4.4%
NOC
Higher net margin
MS
MS
43.7% more per $
MS
52.6%
8.9%
NOC
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
NOC
NOC
Annualised
NOC
-1.7%
-15.8%
MS

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
MS
MS
NOC
NOC
Revenue
$10.7B
$9.9B
Net Profit
$5.6B
$875.0M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
1.9%
Net Margin
52.6%
8.9%
Revenue YoY
16.0%
4.4%
Net Profit YoY
EPS (diluted)
$6.14

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
MS
MS
NOC
NOC
Q1 26
$10.7B
$9.9B
Q4 25
$17.9B
$11.7B
Q3 25
$18.2B
$10.4B
Q2 25
$16.8B
$10.4B
Q1 25
$17.7B
$9.5B
Q4 24
$10.7B
Q3 24
$15.4B
$10.0B
Q2 24
$15.0B
$10.2B
Net Profit
MS
MS
NOC
NOC
Q1 26
$5.6B
$875.0M
Q4 25
$4.4B
$1.4B
Q3 25
$4.6B
$1.1B
Q2 25
$3.5B
$1.2B
Q1 25
$4.3B
$481.0M
Q4 24
$1.3B
Q3 24
$3.2B
$1.0B
Q2 24
$3.1B
$940.0M
Operating Margin
MS
MS
NOC
NOC
Q1 26
1.9%
Q4 25
32.2%
10.9%
Q3 25
33.1%
11.9%
Q2 25
27.5%
13.8%
Q1 25
31.3%
6.1%
Q4 24
10.2%
Q3 24
27.4%
11.2%
Q2 24
27.1%
10.7%
Net Margin
MS
MS
NOC
NOC
Q1 26
52.6%
8.9%
Q4 25
24.6%
12.2%
Q3 25
25.3%
10.6%
Q2 25
21.1%
11.3%
Q1 25
24.3%
5.1%
Q4 24
11.8%
Q3 24
20.7%
10.3%
Q2 24
20.5%
9.2%
EPS (diluted)
MS
MS
NOC
NOC
Q1 26
$6.14
Q4 25
$2.68
$9.94
Q3 25
$2.80
$7.67
Q2 25
$2.13
$8.15
Q1 25
$2.60
$3.32
Q4 24
$8.66
Q3 24
$1.88
$7.00
Q2 24
$1.82
$6.36

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
MS
MS
NOC
NOC
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$2.1B
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$5.1M
$17.1B
Total Assets
$1581.4B
$50.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
MS
MS
NOC
NOC
Q1 26
$2.1B
Q4 25
$111.7B
$4.4B
Q3 25
$103.7B
$2.0B
Q2 25
$109.1B
$1.9B
Q1 25
$90.7B
$1.7B
Q4 24
$4.4B
Q3 24
$91.1B
$3.3B
Q2 24
$90.2B
$3.3B
Total Debt
MS
MS
NOC
NOC
Q1 26
Q4 25
$341.7B
$15.2B
Q3 25
$324.1B
Q2 25
$320.1B
Q1 25
$297.0B
Q4 24
$14.7B
Q3 24
$291.2B
Q2 24
$269.9B
Stockholders' Equity
MS
MS
NOC
NOC
Q1 26
$5.1M
$17.1B
Q4 25
$111.6B
$16.7B
Q3 25
$110.0B
$16.0B
Q2 25
$108.2B
$15.5B
Q1 25
$106.8B
$15.0B
Q4 24
$15.3B
Q3 24
$103.6B
$14.7B
Q2 24
$100.7B
$14.3B
Total Assets
MS
MS
NOC
NOC
Q1 26
$1581.4B
$50.0B
Q4 25
$1420.3B
$51.4B
Q3 25
$1364.8B
$49.3B
Q2 25
$1353.9B
$49.5B
Q1 25
$1300.3B
$48.5B
Q4 24
$49.4B
Q3 24
$1258.0B
$48.3B
Q2 24
$1212.4B
$47.7B
Debt / Equity
MS
MS
NOC
NOC
Q1 26
Q4 25
3.06×
0.91×
Q3 25
2.95×
Q2 25
2.96×
Q1 25
2.78×
Q4 24
0.96×
Q3 24
2.81×
Q2 24
2.68×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
MS
MS
NOC
NOC
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-1.7B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-1.8B
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-18.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-1.89×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$3.3B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
MS
MS
NOC
NOC
Q1 26
$-1.7B
Q4 25
$-2.4B
$3.9B
Q3 25
$-3.3B
$1.6B
Q2 25
$11.8B
$868.0M
Q1 25
$-24.0B
$-1.6B
Q4 24
$2.6B
Q3 24
$1.1B
Q2 24
$1.4B
Free Cash Flow
MS
MS
NOC
NOC
Q1 26
$-1.8B
Q4 25
$3.2B
Q3 25
$1.3B
Q2 25
$637.0M
Q1 25
$-1.8B
Q4 24
$1.8B
Q3 24
$730.0M
Q2 24
$1.1B
FCF Margin
MS
MS
NOC
NOC
Q1 26
-18.4%
Q4 25
27.6%
Q3 25
12.1%
Q2 25
6.2%
Q1 25
-19.2%
Q4 24
16.5%
Q3 24
7.3%
Q2 24
10.8%
Capex Intensity
MS
MS
NOC
NOC
Q1 26
1.7%
Q4 25
5.7%
Q3 25
2.9%
Q2 25
2.2%
Q1 25
2.7%
Q4 24
7.6%
Q3 24
3.6%
Q2 24
3.1%
Cash Conversion
MS
MS
NOC
NOC
Q1 26
-1.89×
Q4 25
-0.55×
2.73×
Q3 25
-0.72×
1.42×
Q2 25
3.34×
0.74×
Q1 25
-5.56×
-3.25×
Q4 24
2.04×
Q3 24
1.06×
Q2 24
1.52×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

MS
MS

Segment breakdown not available.

NOC
NOC

Aeronautics Systems$3.3B33%
Mission Systems$2.9B29%
Space Systems$2.5B25%
Other$1.3B13%

Related Comparisons