vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Morgan Stanley (MS) and PepsiCo (PEP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

PepsiCo is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($29.3B vs $17.9B, roughly 1.6× Morgan Stanley). Morgan Stanley runs the higher net margin — 24.6% vs 8.7%, a 15.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.

Morgan Stanley is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered at 1585 Broadway in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. With offices in 42 countries and more than 80,000 employees, the firm's clients include corporations, governments, institutions, and individuals. Morgan Stanley ranked No. 61 in the 2023 Fortune 500 list of the largest United States corporations by total revenue and in the same year ranked No. 30 in the Forbes Global 2000.

PepsiCo, Inc. is an American multinational food and beverage corporation headquartered in Harrison, New York, in the hamlet of Purchase. PepsiCo's business encompasses all aspects of the food and beverage market. It oversees the manufacturing, distribution, and marketing of its products. PepsiCo was formed in 1965 with the merger of the Pepsi-Cola Company and Frito-Lay, Inc., PepsiCo has since expanded from its namesake product Pepsi to an immensely diversified range of food and beverage brands.

MS vs PEP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PEP
PEP
1.6× larger
PEP
$29.3B
$17.9B
MS
Higher net margin
MS
MS
15.9% more per $
MS
24.6%
8.7%
PEP

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
MS
MS
PEP
PEP
Revenue
$17.9B
$29.3B
Net Profit
$4.4B
$2.5B
Gross Margin
53.2%
Operating Margin
32.2%
12.1%
Net Margin
24.6%
8.7%
Revenue YoY
5.6%
Net Profit YoY
66.8%
EPS (diluted)
$2.68
$1.85

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
MS
MS
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
$17.9B
$29.3B
Q3 25
$18.2B
$23.9B
Q2 25
$16.8B
$22.7B
Q1 25
$17.7B
$17.9B
Q4 24
$27.8B
Q3 24
$15.4B
$23.3B
Q2 24
$15.0B
$22.5B
Q1 24
$15.1B
$18.3B
Net Profit
MS
MS
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
$4.4B
$2.5B
Q3 25
$4.6B
$2.6B
Q2 25
$3.5B
$1.3B
Q1 25
$4.3B
$1.8B
Q4 24
$1.5B
Q3 24
$3.2B
$2.9B
Q2 24
$3.1B
$3.1B
Q1 24
$3.4B
$2.0B
Gross Margin
MS
MS
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
53.2%
Q3 25
53.6%
Q2 25
54.7%
Q1 25
55.8%
Q4 24
52.6%
Q3 24
55.4%
Q2 24
55.9%
Q1 24
54.8%
Operating Margin
MS
MS
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
32.2%
12.1%
Q3 25
33.1%
14.9%
Q2 25
27.5%
7.9%
Q1 25
31.3%
14.4%
Q4 24
8.1%
Q3 24
27.4%
16.6%
Q2 24
27.1%
18.0%
Q1 24
29.0%
14.9%
Net Margin
MS
MS
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
24.6%
8.7%
Q3 25
25.3%
10.9%
Q2 25
21.1%
5.6%
Q1 25
24.3%
10.2%
Q4 24
5.5%
Q3 24
20.7%
12.6%
Q2 24
20.5%
13.7%
Q1 24
22.5%
11.2%
EPS (diluted)
MS
MS
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
$2.68
$1.85
Q3 25
$2.80
$1.90
Q2 25
$2.13
$0.92
Q1 25
$2.60
$1.33
Q4 24
$1.11
Q3 24
$1.88
$2.13
Q2 24
$1.82
$2.23
Q1 24
$2.02
$1.48

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
MS
MS
PEP
PEP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$111.7B
$9.5B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$341.7B
$42.3B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$111.6B
$20.4B
Total Assets
$1420.3B
$107.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
3.06×
2.07×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
MS
MS
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
$111.7B
$9.5B
Q3 25
$103.7B
$8.7B
Q2 25
$109.1B
$8.0B
Q1 25
$90.7B
$8.6B
Q4 24
$9.3B
Q3 24
$91.1B
$8.1B
Q2 24
$90.2B
$6.7B
Q1 24
$102.3B
$8.3B
Total Debt
MS
MS
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
$341.7B
$42.3B
Q3 25
$324.1B
$44.1B
Q2 25
$320.1B
$39.3B
Q1 25
$297.0B
$39.4B
Q4 24
$37.2B
Q3 24
$291.2B
$38.5B
Q2 24
$269.9B
$36.6B
Q1 24
$266.1B
$37.7B
Stockholders' Equity
MS
MS
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
$111.6B
$20.4B
Q3 25
$110.0B
$19.4B
Q2 25
$108.2B
$18.4B
Q1 25
$106.8B
$18.4B
Q4 24
$18.0B
Q3 24
$103.6B
$19.5B
Q2 24
$100.7B
$19.4B
Q1 24
$99.2B
$19.0B
Total Assets
MS
MS
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
$1420.3B
$107.4B
Q3 25
$1364.8B
$106.6B
Q2 25
$1353.9B
$105.3B
Q1 25
$1300.3B
$101.7B
Q4 24
$99.5B
Q3 24
$1258.0B
$100.5B
Q2 24
$1212.4B
$99.5B
Q1 24
$1228.5B
$100.0B
Debt / Equity
MS
MS
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
3.06×
2.07×
Q3 25
2.95×
2.28×
Q2 25
2.96×
2.14×
Q1 25
2.78×
2.14×
Q4 24
2.06×
Q3 24
2.81×
1.98×
Q2 24
2.68×
1.88×
Q1 24
2.68×
1.98×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
MS
MS
PEP
PEP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-2.4B
$6.6B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$4.7B
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
16.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
6.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-0.55×
2.61×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$7.7B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
MS
MS
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
$-2.4B
$6.6B
Q3 25
$-3.3B
$4.5B
Q2 25
$11.8B
$2.0B
Q1 25
$-24.0B
$-973.0M
Q4 24
$6.3B
Q3 24
$4.9B
Q2 24
$2.4B
Q1 24
$4.4B
$-1.0B
Free Cash Flow
MS
MS
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
$4.7B
Q3 25
$3.5B
Q2 25
$1.1B
Q1 25
$-1.6B
Q4 24
$3.8B
Q3 24
$3.8B
Q2 24
$1.3B
Q1 24
$-1.7B
FCF Margin
MS
MS
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
16.0%
Q3 25
14.5%
Q2 25
4.7%
Q1 25
-8.8%
Q4 24
13.7%
Q3 24
16.1%
Q2 24
5.6%
Q1 24
-9.1%
Capex Intensity
MS
MS
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
6.5%
Q3 25
4.1%
Q2 25
4.0%
Q1 25
3.4%
Q4 24
8.9%
Q3 24
4.9%
Q2 24
4.8%
Q1 24
3.4%
Cash Conversion
MS
MS
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
-0.55×
2.61×
Q3 25
-0.72×
1.72×
Q2 25
3.34×
1.56×
Q1 25
-5.56×
-0.53×
Q4 24
4.13×
Q3 24
1.67×
Q2 24
0.76×
Q1 24
1.28×
-0.51×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

MS
MS

Segment breakdown not available.

PEP
PEP

Pepsi Co Foods North America$8.3B28%
Pepsi Co Beverages North America$8.2B28%
Europe Middle East Africa Segment$6.1B21%
Latin America Foods Segment$3.7B13%
International Beverage Franchise$1.6B5%
Asia Pacific Foods Segment$1.5B5%

Related Comparisons