vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Morgan Stanley (MS) and Procter & Gamble (PG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Procter & Gamble is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.2B vs $17.9B, roughly 1.2× Morgan Stanley). Morgan Stanley runs the higher net margin — 24.6% vs 18.6%, a 6.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.

Morgan Stanley is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered at 1585 Broadway in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. With offices in 42 countries and more than 80,000 employees, the firm's clients include corporations, governments, institutions, and individuals. Morgan Stanley ranked No. 61 in the 2023 Fortune 500 list of the largest United States corporations by total revenue and in the same year ranked No. 30 in the Forbes Global 2000.

The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) is an American multinational consumer goods corporation incorporated and headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio.

MS vs PG — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PG
PG
1.2× larger
PG
$21.2B
$17.9B
MS
Higher net margin
MS
MS
6.0% more per $
MS
24.6%
18.6%
PG

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
MS
MS
PG
PG
Revenue
$17.9B
$21.2B
Net Profit
$4.4B
$4.0B
Gross Margin
49.5%
Operating Margin
32.2%
21.5%
Net Margin
24.6%
18.6%
Revenue YoY
7.0%
Net Profit YoY
4.0%
EPS (diluted)
$2.68
$1.63

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
MS
MS
PG
PG
Q1 26
$21.2B
Q4 25
$17.9B
$22.2B
Q3 25
$18.2B
$22.4B
Q2 25
$16.8B
$20.9B
Q1 25
$17.7B
$19.8B
Q4 24
$21.9B
Q3 24
$15.4B
$21.7B
Q2 24
$15.0B
$20.5B
Net Profit
MS
MS
PG
PG
Q1 26
$4.0B
Q4 25
$4.4B
$4.3B
Q3 25
$4.6B
$4.8B
Q2 25
$3.5B
$3.6B
Q1 25
$4.3B
$3.8B
Q4 24
$4.6B
Q3 24
$3.2B
$4.0B
Q2 24
$3.1B
$3.1B
Gross Margin
MS
MS
PG
PG
Q1 26
49.5%
Q4 25
51.2%
Q3 25
51.4%
Q2 25
49.1%
Q1 25
51.0%
Q4 24
52.4%
Q3 24
52.1%
Q2 24
49.6%
Operating Margin
MS
MS
PG
PG
Q1 26
21.5%
Q4 25
32.2%
24.2%
Q3 25
33.1%
26.2%
Q2 25
27.5%
20.8%
Q1 25
31.3%
23.0%
Q4 24
26.2%
Q3 24
27.4%
26.7%
Q2 24
27.1%
18.9%
Net Margin
MS
MS
PG
PG
Q1 26
18.6%
Q4 25
24.6%
19.4%
Q3 25
25.3%
21.2%
Q2 25
21.1%
17.3%
Q1 25
24.3%
19.1%
Q4 24
21.2%
Q3 24
20.7%
18.2%
Q2 24
20.5%
15.3%
EPS (diluted)
MS
MS
PG
PG
Q1 26
$1.63
Q4 25
$2.68
$1.78
Q3 25
$2.80
$1.95
Q2 25
$2.13
$1.48
Q1 25
$2.60
$1.54
Q4 24
$1.88
Q3 24
$1.88
$1.61
Q2 24
$1.82
$1.27

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
MS
MS
PG
PG
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$111.7B
$12.3B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$341.7B
$23.9B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$111.6B
$54.7B
Total Assets
$1420.3B
$128.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
3.06×
0.44×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
MS
MS
PG
PG
Q1 26
$12.3B
Q4 25
$111.7B
Q3 25
$103.7B
Q2 25
$109.1B
Q1 25
$90.7B
Q4 24
Q3 24
$91.1B
Q2 24
$90.2B
Total Debt
MS
MS
PG
PG
Q1 26
$23.9B
Q4 25
$341.7B
Q3 25
$324.1B
Q2 25
$320.1B
Q1 25
$297.0B
Q4 24
Q3 24
$291.2B
Q2 24
$269.9B
Stockholders' Equity
MS
MS
PG
PG
Q1 26
$54.7B
Q4 25
$111.6B
$53.3B
Q3 25
$110.0B
$53.6B
Q2 25
$108.2B
$52.3B
Q1 25
$106.8B
$52.5B
Q4 24
$51.4B
Q3 24
$103.6B
$52.1B
Q2 24
$100.7B
$50.6B
Total Assets
MS
MS
PG
PG
Q1 26
$128.4B
Q4 25
$1420.3B
$127.3B
Q3 25
$1364.8B
$127.6B
Q2 25
$1353.9B
$125.2B
Q1 25
$1300.3B
$123.0B
Q4 24
$122.6B
Q3 24
$1258.0B
$126.5B
Q2 24
$1212.4B
$122.4B
Debt / Equity
MS
MS
PG
PG
Q1 26
0.44×
Q4 25
3.06×
Q3 25
2.95×
Q2 25
2.96×
Q1 25
2.78×
Q4 24
Q3 24
2.81×
Q2 24
2.68×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
MS
MS
PG
PG
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-2.4B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
15.9%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-0.55×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
MS
MS
PG
PG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-2.4B
$5.0B
Q3 25
$-3.3B
$5.4B
Q2 25
$11.8B
$5.0B
Q1 25
$-24.0B
$3.7B
Q4 24
$4.8B
Q3 24
$4.3B
Q2 24
$5.8B
Free Cash Flow
MS
MS
PG
PG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$3.8B
Q3 25
$4.2B
Q2 25
$4.0B
Q1 25
$2.8B
Q4 24
$3.9B
Q3 24
$3.3B
Q2 24
$5.0B
FCF Margin
MS
MS
PG
PG
Q1 26
Q4 25
17.1%
Q3 25
18.8%
Q2 25
19.1%
Q1 25
14.4%
Q4 24
17.8%
Q3 24
15.2%
Q2 24
24.2%
Capex Intensity
MS
MS
PG
PG
Q1 26
15.9%
Q4 25
5.3%
Q3 25
5.4%
Q2 25
4.8%
Q1 25
4.3%
Q4 24
4.2%
Q3 24
4.6%
Q2 24
3.8%
Cash Conversion
MS
MS
PG
PG
Q1 26
Q4 25
-0.55×
1.15×
Q3 25
-0.72×
1.14×
Q2 25
3.34×
1.38×
Q1 25
-5.56×
0.98×
Q4 24
1.04×
Q3 24
1.09×
Q2 24
1.83×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

MS
MS

Segment breakdown not available.

PG
PG

Fabric & Home Care$7.4B35%
Baby, Feminine & Family Care$5.1B24%
Beauty$3.9B18%
Health Care$3.1B14%
Grooming$1.6B8%
Corporate$225.0M1%

Related Comparisons