vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Morgan Stanley (MS) and United Parcel Service (UPS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

United Parcel Service is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.2B vs $17.9B, roughly 1.2× Morgan Stanley). Morgan Stanley runs the higher net margin — 24.6% vs 4.1%, a 20.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.

Morgan Stanley is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered at 1585 Broadway in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. With offices in 42 countries and more than 80,000 employees, the firm's clients include corporations, governments, institutions, and individuals. Morgan Stanley ranked No. 61 in the 2023 Fortune 500 list of the largest United States corporations by total revenue and in the same year ranked No. 30 in the Forbes Global 2000.

United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) is an American multinational shipping & receiving and supply chain management company founded in 1907. Originally known as the American Messenger Company specializing in telegraphs, UPS has expanded to become a Fortune 500 company and one of the world's largest shipping couriers. UPS today is primarily known for its ground shipping services as well as the UPS Store, a retail chain which assists UPS shipments and provides tools for small businesses.

MS vs UPS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
UPS
UPS
1.2× larger
UPS
$21.2B
$17.9B
MS
Higher net margin
MS
MS
20.5% more per $
MS
24.6%
4.1%
UPS

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
MS
MS
UPS
UPS
Revenue
$17.9B
$21.2B
Net Profit
$4.4B
$864.0M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
32.2%
6.0%
Net Margin
24.6%
4.1%
Revenue YoY
-1.6%
Net Profit YoY
EPS (diluted)
$2.68
$1.02

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
MS
MS
UPS
UPS
Q1 26
$21.2B
Q4 25
$17.9B
$24.5B
Q3 25
$18.2B
$21.4B
Q2 25
$16.8B
$21.2B
Q1 25
$17.7B
$21.5B
Q4 24
$25.3B
Q3 24
$15.4B
$22.2B
Q2 24
$15.0B
$21.8B
Net Profit
MS
MS
UPS
UPS
Q1 26
$864.0M
Q4 25
$4.4B
$1.8B
Q3 25
$4.6B
$1.3B
Q2 25
$3.5B
$1.3B
Q1 25
$4.3B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$1.7B
Q3 24
$3.2B
$1.5B
Q2 24
$3.1B
$1.4B
Operating Margin
MS
MS
UPS
UPS
Q1 26
6.0%
Q4 25
32.2%
10.5%
Q3 25
33.1%
8.4%
Q2 25
27.5%
8.6%
Q1 25
31.3%
7.7%
Q4 24
11.6%
Q3 24
27.4%
8.9%
Q2 24
27.1%
8.9%
Net Margin
MS
MS
UPS
UPS
Q1 26
4.1%
Q4 25
24.6%
7.3%
Q3 25
25.3%
6.1%
Q2 25
21.1%
6.0%
Q1 25
24.3%
5.5%
Q4 24
6.8%
Q3 24
20.7%
6.9%
Q2 24
20.5%
6.5%
EPS (diluted)
MS
MS
UPS
UPS
Q1 26
$1.02
Q4 25
$2.68
$2.10
Q3 25
$2.80
$1.55
Q2 25
$2.13
$1.51
Q1 25
$2.60
$1.40
Q4 24
$2.00
Q3 24
$1.88
$1.80
Q2 24
$1.82
$1.65

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
MS
MS
UPS
UPS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$111.7B
$5.8B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$341.7B
$23.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$111.6B
Total Assets
$1420.3B
$71.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
3.06×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
MS
MS
UPS
UPS
Q1 26
$5.8B
Q4 25
$111.7B
$5.9B
Q3 25
$103.7B
$6.8B
Q2 25
$109.1B
$6.3B
Q1 25
$90.7B
$5.1B
Q4 24
$6.3B
Q3 24
$91.1B
$6.1B
Q2 24
$90.2B
$6.5B
Total Debt
MS
MS
UPS
UPS
Q1 26
$23.7B
Q4 25
$341.7B
$23.5B
Q3 25
$324.1B
$23.9B
Q2 25
$320.1B
$23.8B
Q1 25
$297.0B
$19.5B
Q4 24
$19.4B
Q3 24
$291.2B
$20.3B
Q2 24
$269.9B
$20.2B
Stockholders' Equity
MS
MS
UPS
UPS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$111.6B
$16.2B
Q3 25
$110.0B
$15.8B
Q2 25
$108.2B
$15.8B
Q1 25
$106.8B
$15.7B
Q4 24
$16.7B
Q3 24
$103.6B
$16.9B
Q2 24
$100.7B
$17.0B
Total Assets
MS
MS
UPS
UPS
Q1 26
$71.8B
Q4 25
$1420.3B
$73.1B
Q3 25
$1364.8B
$71.4B
Q2 25
$1353.9B
$70.9B
Q1 25
$1300.3B
$68.5B
Q4 24
$70.1B
Q3 24
$1258.0B
$68.3B
Q2 24
$1212.4B
$69.4B
Debt / Equity
MS
MS
UPS
UPS
Q1 26
Q4 25
3.06×
1.45×
Q3 25
2.95×
1.51×
Q2 25
2.96×
1.51×
Q1 25
2.78×
1.25×
Q4 24
1.16×
Q3 24
2.81×
1.21×
Q2 24
2.68×
1.19×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
MS
MS
UPS
UPS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-2.4B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$1.3B
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
6.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.9%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-0.55×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$4.6B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
MS
MS
UPS
UPS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-2.4B
$3.3B
Q3 25
$-3.3B
$2.5B
Q2 25
$11.8B
$348.0M
Q1 25
$-24.0B
$2.3B
Q4 24
$3.3B
Q3 24
$1.5B
Q2 24
$2.0B
Free Cash Flow
MS
MS
UPS
UPS
Q1 26
$1.3B
Q4 25
$2.6B
Q3 25
$1.5B
Q2 25
$-775.0M
Q1 25
$1.4B
Q4 24
$2.2B
Q3 24
$655.0M
Q2 24
$1.1B
FCF Margin
MS
MS
UPS
UPS
Q1 26
6.0%
Q4 25
10.6%
Q3 25
7.1%
Q2 25
-3.7%
Q1 25
6.7%
Q4 24
8.8%
Q3 24
2.9%
Q2 24
4.9%
Capex Intensity
MS
MS
UPS
UPS
Q1 26
4.9%
Q4 25
2.9%
Q3 25
4.5%
Q2 25
5.3%
Q1 25
4.1%
Q4 24
4.3%
Q3 24
3.8%
Q2 24
4.3%
Cash Conversion
MS
MS
UPS
UPS
Q1 26
Q4 25
-0.55×
1.84×
Q3 25
-0.72×
1.89×
Q2 25
3.34×
0.27×
Q1 25
-5.56×
1.95×
Q4 24
1.93×
Q3 24
0.97×
Q2 24
1.41×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

MS
MS

Segment breakdown not available.

UPS
UPS

U.S. Domestic Package$14.1B67%
International Package$4.5B21%
Supply Chain Solutions$2.5B12%

Related Comparisons